TLDR ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content. Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam. ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet. Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms. [...] The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content. Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam. ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet. Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms. [...] The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.

ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content

TLDR

  • ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content.
  • Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam.
  • ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet.
  • Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms.

ZachXBT has sharply criticized major InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps, Galxe, and Layer3 for fueling a rise in AI-driven spam and low-quality content. He claims these platforms, by incentivizing engagement farming, are polluting the ecosystem and undermining genuine discussions. ZachXBT’s critique has sparked a wider debate on the consequences of automated content flooding, with many users calling for reforms to restore authenticity to these platforms.

ZachXBT Criticizes AI-Driven Spam in InfoFi Platforms

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has raised concerns about the growing problem of AI-generated spam in the InfoFi space. In recent social media posts, he targeted several prominent platforms such as Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, and Wallchain. According to ZachXBT, these platforms encourage AI bots to flood feeds with low-value interactions, resulting in what he describes as “ecosystem pollution.”

He pointed out that many of these platforms incentivize users to engage in repetitive, low-quality activity to earn rewards. This, he argues, leads to a flood of AI-generated content that undermines meaningful discussion and harms the credibility of the ecosystem. “All the meta has done is boost AI slop and low-quality content while pretending it brought sticky users to the project,” he wrote in a response to a promotion for Kaito Yaps in July.

AI Bots Overrun Platforms Like Kaito Yaps and Galxe

InfoFi platforms, such as Kaito Yaps and Galxe, have faced scrutiny for their use of AI models to incentivize user engagement. These platforms reward users with tokens for activities like market commentary, predictions, and social media posts. However, critics argue that these reward structures have encouraged the rise of automated bots designed to produce high volumes of low-quality content.

The issue is exacerbated by the engagement-driven systems that prioritize quantity over the quality of user contributions. ZachXBT criticized these platforms for promoting a “game the system” mentality, where bots and coordinated groups flood feeds to maximize rewards. He believes this undermines genuine user interactions and weakens the integrity of discussions.

ZachXBT Launches Bounty for Data Scraping

To bring attention to the issue, ZachXBT has initiated a bounty program. He is offering cash rewards for individuals who can successfully scrape user data from the platforms in question. The aim is to gather data that can expose the scale of AI-driven activity across platforms like Kaito Yaps, Wallchain, Galxe, and Layer3.

On his Telegram channel, ZachXBT posted a bounty of $5,000 for the first person who could compile data sets from the specified platforms. He urged people to collect any available information, including usernames, user IDs, and on-chain addresses. His efforts highlight the growing frustration within the crypto community with the increasing prevalence of automated, low-value content.

Community Pushback Against Engagement Farming

The growing criticism of InfoFi platforms is not limited to ZachXBT. Many users within the crypto community have voiced their frustration with the engagement farming tactics seen on platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe. Some argue that the incentive structures reward users for posting content that adds little value to the discussion.

“Instead of experts, we have an army of mercenaries. Instead of discussions, we have ‘Reply Guys’ on steroids,” said Azel, a community commentator. Many users feel that these platforms have shifted their focus from genuine conversation to artificial metrics that prioritize engagement over substance.

In response to these concerns, some platforms have begun exploring ways to improve the quality of content by reducing the influence of AI bots. Despite these efforts, the ongoing challenge of balancing user engagement with content quality remains a significant issue for the InfoFi space.

The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03575
$0.03575$0.03575
-2.77%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

The post Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Singapore-based man has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:17