According to CryptoQuant analysis, short-term Bitcoin holders continue experiencing prolonged losses, indicating the market is undergoing what analysts describe as a weak-hand cleansing phase. This process sees supply gradually shifting from investors with lower conviction to those willing to accumulate and hold through volatility.According to CryptoQuant analysis, short-term Bitcoin holders continue experiencing prolonged losses, indicating the market is undergoing what analysts describe as a weak-hand cleansing phase. This process sees supply gradually shifting from investors with lower conviction to those willing to accumulate and hold through volatility.

CryptoQuant: Short-Term Holders Face Extended Losses in Market Cleansing Phase

2025/12/16 14:21

On-chain data reveals Bitcoin supply gradually transferring from weaker hands to higher-conviction holders, a pattern historically preceding sustained rallies.

The Shakeout Underway

According to CryptoQuant analysis, short-term Bitcoin holders continue experiencing prolonged losses, indicating the market is undergoing what analysts describe as a weak-hand cleansing phase. This process sees supply gradually shifting from investors with lower conviction to those willing to accumulate and hold through volatility.

The dynamic represents a natural market cycle where less committed participants capitulate, transferring their holdings to buyers with longer time horizons and greater tolerance for drawdowns.

Understanding Short-Term Holder Behavior

Short-term holders, typically defined as wallets holding Bitcoin for less than 155 days, often represent more speculative market participants. These investors tend to enter during periods of excitement and exit when prices stagnate or decline, making them reliable indicators of retail sentiment.

When short-term holders sit in prolonged loss positions, selling pressure intensifies as the psychological burden of unrealized losses weighs on decision-making. Many eventually capitulate, selling at a loss to end the discomfort or to deploy capital elsewhere.

CryptoQuant's data suggests this capitulation process is actively occurring, with short-term holder supply contracting as coins move to stronger hands.

Supply Migration to Stronger Hands

The transfer of supply from short-term to long-term holders carries significant market implications. Long-term holders, sometimes called diamond hands, demonstrate willingness to weather substantial volatility without selling. Their accumulation during periods of weakness effectively removes supply from active circulation.

As more Bitcoin moves to these higher-conviction holders, the available supply for trading diminishes. This supply compression can amplify price movements when demand eventually returns, as fewer coins remain available for purchase at any given price level.

Historical Precedent

Previous market cycles have exhibited similar patterns before significant rallies. The capitulation of weak hands and accumulation by strong hands often marks the final stages of consolidation phases. Once selling pressure from short-term holders exhausts itself, markets can advance more freely as remaining holders prove reluctant to sell.

This pattern appeared before Bitcoin's major runs in previous cycles, though historical precedent offers no guarantee of repetition.

Current Market Context

The weak-hand cleansing phase identified by CryptoQuant aligns with other concerning metrics. Active addresses have fallen to 12-month lows, miner revenues have declined significantly, and Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs experienced substantial outflows on December 15.

However, interpreting these signals requires nuance. What appears bearish in isolation may actually represent healthy market structure development. The removal of speculative excess and concentration of supply among committed holders can establish stronger foundations for future appreciation.

Implications for Market Participants

For investors considering entry, the cleansing phase presents a double-edged sword. Prices may continue experiencing pressure as remaining weak hands capitulate, but the ongoing supply transfer suggests the market is building a base of committed holders.

Those already holding Bitcoin face a decision point. Joining the capitulation completes the transfer to stronger hands, while maintaining positions preserves potential upside once selling pressure subsides.

What to Watch

CryptoQuant's analysis points to monitoring short-term holder cost basis and profitability metrics. When short-term holders return to profitability without immediately selling, it often signals renewed confidence and the potential exhaustion of selling pressure.

Until then, the weak-hand cleansing continues reshaping Bitcoin's holder distribution in ways that may prove constructive for long-term price development.

Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You May Also Like

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

PaaS leader ensures seamless migrations and uninterrupted payment operations LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Volante Technologies, the global leader in Payments as a Service
Share
AI Journal2025/12/16 17:16
Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00