Top general immediately contradicts Trump Pentagon chief’s attack on oversight

On Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared before Congress to answer questions under oath for the first time since the start of the war with Iran. Hegseth struck a hostile posture toward his questioners, but as CNN Pentagon reporter Haley Britzky points out, his attack was immediately undercut by his top general.

Diverging from his prepared statement, Hegseth took a moment to assert that, “The biggest adversary we face at this point are the reckless, feckless and defeatist words of Congressional Democrats and some Republicans.” But moments later, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine — who was seated directly beside his boss Hegseth at the time — referred in his opening remarks that General George C. Marshall's commitment to a non-partisan military "remains a constant standard and something I borrow from often."

Caine’s words are in direct contradiction to Hegseth’s. The former was citing one of America’s most illustrious generals, who played a key role in directing the country’s victory in WWII and oversaw the reconstruction of Europe under the “Marshall Plan” that took his name — the latter effort earning him the Nobel Peace Prize, making him the only Army general to receive the honor. Marshall famously did not vote or join political parties to avoid the perception of political bias, and was a staunch advocate of non-partisan, civilian control of the military. Marshall’s military style, Caine's statement suggests, would clash with Hegseth’s hyper-partisan approach to leadership.

Hegseth’s appearance before Congress has raised no shortage of controversy. He took a moment to blame Democrats for “getting us into” Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam, even though the first two wars were started under Republican George W. Bush, and the Vietnam War reached its apex under Republican Richard Nixon. When asked whether Hegseth stood by his March assertion that the U.S. military would offer “no quarter” to its enemies — which if followed through is widely considered a war crime — he dodged by saying merely, “We fight to win.” And he received strong questioning and delivered vague or misleading answers regarding budgets, the war in Iran’s timeline, recent firings of military leadership and more.

His performance has drawn no shortage of criticism.

“I'm watching Pete Hegseth testify and anyone who does so with an open mind will readily see that he is a caricature,” posted filmmaker Dan Partland, who directed a documentary about the first Trump administration. “He has delusions that he is starring in an action movie…He is a brazen politician serving an audience of one. He is a Made for TV concoction, and a vacuous mishmash of hormones and neurotransmitters. That he's running the US Defense Dept. is incredibly dangerous and disturbing.”

• george conway
• noam chomsky
• civil war
• Kayleigh mcenany
• Melania trump
• drudge report
• paul krugman
• Lindsey graham
• Lincoln project
• al franken bill maher
• People of praise
• Ivanka trump
• eric trump