Fintech infrastructure companies raised $18.6 billion in venture capital in 2024, representing 35% of all fintech investment, according to CB Insights. The categoryFintech infrastructure companies raised $18.6 billion in venture capital in 2024, representing 35% of all fintech investment, according to CB Insights. The category

Why Investors Are Interested in Fintech Infrastructure

2026/03/27 07:28
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Fintech infrastructure companies raised $18.6 billion in venture capital in 2024, representing 35% of all fintech investment, according to CB Insights. The category — which includes core banking platforms, payment processing systems, compliance automation tools, and Banking-as-a-Service providers — has attracted the highest share of fintech VC for three consecutive years. Investors are prioritising infrastructure because it captures value from every fintech company and every financial transaction built on top of it, creating durable businesses with compounding network effects.

The Infrastructure Investment Thesis

Infrastructure companies in any technology sector share attractive characteristics: high switching costs, recurring revenue, and leverage from every customer and transaction that runs on the platform. In fintech, these characteristics are amplified by the regulated nature of financial services, which adds compliance requirements that increase the value of infrastructure providers and raise barriers to entry for competitors.

Why Investors Are Interested in Fintech Infrastructure

According to McKinsey, fintech infrastructure companies retain customers at rates exceeding 95% annually, compared to 85% for fintech application companies. The retention advantage reflects the difficulty and risk of migrating core financial systems — a bank that has integrated its operations with a core banking platform or payment processor faces months of migration work and significant operational risk to switch providers.

The revenue model is equally attractive. Infrastructure companies generate transaction-based revenue that scales with customer growth. When a fintech startup built on a BaaS platform acquires more customers, the infrastructure provider’s revenue grows automatically without additional sales effort. According to Forrester Research, the median fintech infrastructure company generates 120% net dollar retention — meaning existing customers generate 20% more revenue each year as their usage grows.

Infrastructure Categories Attracting Capital

Core banking platforms (Thought Machine, Mambu, 10x Banking) raised $4.2 billion as banks and neobanks replace mainframe-era systems with cloud-native alternatives. Payment infrastructure (Stripe, Adyen, Checkout.com, Marqeta) raised $5.8 billion as digital commerce volumes grow. Compliance and risk infrastructure (Alloy, Sardine, Chainalysis) raised $3.1 billion as regulatory requirements increase globally. BaaS platforms (Unit, Treasury Prime, Synctera) raised $2.4 billion as embedded finance adoption accelerates.

According to industry projections, the fintech infrastructure market will reach $120 billion in annual revenue by 2028, growing at 22% annually. The growth is driven by three factors: more digital banking platforms launching on modern infrastructure, more non-financial companies embedding financial services through BaaS, and more traditional banks migrating legacy systems to cloud-native platforms.

Why Infrastructure Produces Outsized Returns

Fintech infrastructure investments have produced some of the largest venture returns in the sector. Stripe, valued at $65 billion, is a payment infrastructure company. Plaid, valued at $13.4 billion, is a data connectivity infrastructure company. Marqeta, which went public at a $16 billion valuation, is a card issuing infrastructure company. Each built a platform that other companies rely on to deliver financial services.

The outsized returns reflect the leverage inherent in infrastructure businesses. A fintech application company captures value from its own customers. A fintech infrastructure company captures value from every application built on its platform and every customer those applications serve. According to Goldman Sachs, fintech infrastructure companies trade at an average of 15x forward revenue, compared to 8x for fintech application companies, reflecting the durability and compounding nature of their revenue streams.

For venture investors, the infrastructure thesis is straightforward: as fintech grows, infrastructure grows faster because every fintech company and every financial transaction requires infrastructure. The companies that build the most reliable, comprehensive, and scalable financial infrastructure will capture a permanent share of the multi-trillion-dollar financial services economy.

Comments
Market Opportunity
VinuChain Logo
VinuChain Price(VC)
$0.000471
$0.000471$0.000471
-5.61%
USD
VinuChain (VC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

WLFI Technical Analysis Mar 27

WLFI Technical Analysis Mar 27

The post WLFI Technical Analysis Mar 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WLFI, while approaching critical support regions in the downtrend, continues to give
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/27 13:35
Virunga Gorilla Twins Boost Conservation Outlook

Virunga Gorilla Twins Boost Conservation Outlook

The Virunga gorilla twins signal renewed momentum for conservation-driven economic growth in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.   Rare conservation milestone
Share
Furtherafrica2026/03/27 13:00
USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48