Analysts Kip Herriage and Jurrien Timmer assessed where the bottom of the Bitcoin price might be following the recent drop. Continue Reading: Two Experienced ExpertsAnalysts Kip Herriage and Jurrien Timmer assessed where the bottom of the Bitcoin price might be following the recent drop. Continue Reading: Two Experienced Experts

Two Experienced Experts Comment on Whether We’ve Seen the Bottom in Bitcoin – Is the Worst Behind Us?

2026/02/14 21:41
2 min read

Following Bitcoin’s drop to the $60,000 level in the cryptocurrency market, two prominent market figures offered assessments suggesting that the bottom may have been reached.

Kip Herriage, founder and managing partner of Vertical Research Advisory, argued that Bitcoin has bottomed out. According to Herriage, there has been a “clear sell-off peak” in BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT).

Herriage noted that during the period when trading volume reached record levels on IBIT, Bitcoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) fell to its third-highest ever oversold level. He also pointed out that during the same period, the Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index dropped to 5, its lowest point in history.

Herriage stated that according to VRA systems, IBIT has fallen to a level “beyond oversold,” adding, “The rubber band has been stretched too far. As a result, we believe bottom levels have been reached. We are buyers.”

Related News: Altcoin Whales Have Been Very Active in Recent Hours – Here Are Their Trades

On the other hand, Jurrien Timmer said that Bitcoin’s drop to $60,000 last week coincided with the support zone he had previously indicated. Timmer recalled that in his analysis a few months ago, he had stated that the four-year bull cycle might have come to an end.

According to Timmer, Bitcoin’s drop to $60,000 represents a relatively limited correction compared to past “crypto winters.” Stating that Bitcoin has matured into a “commodity currency” over time, Timmer suggested that price fluctuations may be less severe than in the past.

Noting that it is unclear whether $60,000 is the definitive bottom, Timmer stated that his own prediction is that this level is the bottom. According to Timmer, a new cyclical bull market may begin after a few months of sideways and volatile movements. Pointing to the “mathematical congruence” in past cycles, Timmer said this is not a guarantee for future performance, but new highs are possible over time.

*This is not investment advice.

Continue Reading: Two Experienced Experts Comment on Whether We’ve Seen the Bottom in Bitcoin – Is the Worst Behind Us?

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X Üst Düzey Yetkilisi, Platformda Kripto Paralar İçin Müjdeyi Verdi! Ancak Bazı Altcoinler İçin Kötü Haber Olabilir

X Üst Düzey Yetkilisi, Platformda Kripto Paralar İçin Müjdeyi Verdi! Ancak Bazı Altcoinler İçin Kötü Haber Olabilir

X Ürün Lideri ve Solana ekosistem danışmanı Nikita Bier, sosyal medya platformu X’te kripto para kullanımının artmasını desteklediğini ancak spam ve tacizi teşvik
Share
Coinstats2026/02/14 23:11
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00