The relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companiesThe relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companies

Why 75% of Banks Now Collaborate With Fintech Startups

2026/03/24 07:28
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

The relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companies positioning themselves as replacements for traditional banking. Today, roughly 75% of banks worldwide actively collaborate with fintech startups, according to research from KPMG and the World Economic Forum. The antagonistic dynamic has given way to a symbiotic relationship where both sides benefit.

This shift did not happen by accident. Banks discovered that building technology in-house was expensive, slow, and often produced inferior results compared to partnering with specialised fintech companies. Fintech startups learned that scaling financial services requires access to banking infrastructure, regulatory licences, and established customer trust that takes decades to build. Collaboration became the pragmatic choice for both sides.

Why 75% of Banks Now Collaborate With Fintech Startups

Why Banks Turned to Fintech Partnerships

The primary driver of bank-fintech collaboration is speed. Banks operate on technology cycles measured in years. A major core banking upgrade might take three to five years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Fintech partnerships allow banks to deploy new capabilities in months rather than years. A bank that wants to offer real-time payments, digital onboarding, or AI-powered customer service can partner with a fintech provider rather than building from scratch.

Cost pressure is the second major factor. Traditional banks spend between 15% and 25% of their revenue on technology, according to Gartner. Despite these enormous budgets, much of the spending goes toward maintaining legacy systems rather than building new capabilities. Fintech partnerships allow banks to redirect technology investment toward innovation rather than maintenance. The fintech company handles the specialised development, and the bank integrates the solution into its existing infrastructure.

Customer expectations are the third driver. Bank customers, particularly younger demographics, expect digital experiences that match what they receive from consumer technology companies. Banks that cannot deliver seamless mobile banking, instant payments, and personalised financial insights risk losing customers to digital-first competitors. Fintech partnerships enable banks to meet these expectations without building every capability internally.

What Collaboration Looks Like in Practice

Bank-fintech collaboration takes many forms. The simplest is vendor relationships, where banks purchase fintech products or services. A bank might use a fintech company’s fraud detection system, digital onboarding platform, or payment processing engine. These relationships are transactional and focused on specific capabilities.

Strategic partnerships go deeper. A bank and a fintech company might co-develop a product, share data, or jointly serve a customer segment. For example, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apple to launch the Apple Card, combining Goldman’s banking licence and credit capabilities with Apple’s consumer technology platform. Similar partnerships exist between banks and fintech companies across payments, lending, and wealth management.

Investment relationships represent another form of collaboration. Many large banks operate venture capital arms that invest in fintech startups. Citi Ventures, HSBC’s innovation team, and Barclays’ accelerator programme all provide funding, mentorship, and potential integration opportunities to early-stage fintech companies. These investments give banks early access to emerging technologies while providing startups with capital and credibility.

Banking-as-a-service arrangements represent the most integrated form of collaboration. Banks provide their regulatory licences, deposit infrastructure, and payment rails to fintech companies, which then build customer-facing products on top. This model allows fintech companies to offer banking products without obtaining their own licences, while banks earn revenue from infrastructure they have already built.

Where the Partnerships Are Concentrated

Certain areas of banking attract more fintech collaboration than others. Payments is the most active category, with banks partnering with fintech companies for real-time payments, cross-border transfers, and merchant acquiring services. Digital identity and customer onboarding is the second most active area, as banks seek to reduce friction in account opening while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Lending partnerships are growing rapidly, particularly in small business lending and consumer credit. Banks use fintech platforms to reach borrower segments they cannot serve efficiently through traditional channels. The fintech company provides the technology platform and customer acquisition, while the bank provides the capital and regulatory framework.

Compliance and regulatory technology is another growing area. Anti-money laundering, know-your-customer, and transaction monitoring all require sophisticated technology that fintech companies often provide more effectively than internal bank teams. Regulatory requirements continue to increase in complexity, making these partnerships increasingly valuable.

Challenges in Bank-Fintech Collaboration

Despite the growth in partnerships, significant challenges remain. Cultural differences between banks and fintech startups create friction. Banks prioritise risk management, regulatory compliance, and process consistency. Fintech companies prioritise speed, experimentation, and user experience. Bridging these different organisational cultures requires effort from both sides.

Technology integration is often more difficult than anticipated. Connecting a modern fintech platform to a bank’s legacy core banking system can be complex and time-consuming. Data formats, security protocols, and processing workflows may be incompatible. The integration challenge is one of the main reasons bank-fintech partnerships sometimes fail to deliver expected results.

Regulatory uncertainty also creates challenges. Banks are responsible for the compliance of their partners, even when the fintech company is providing the customer-facing service. This third-party risk management requirement means banks must conduct extensive due diligence on their fintech partners and monitor their ongoing compliance. For fintech startups, meeting these requirements can be burdensome and expensive.

The Direction of the Relationship

The 75% collaboration rate will likely continue to increase. The few banks that do not partner with fintech companies tend to be smaller institutions with limited technology budgets or banks in markets where fintech ecosystems are less developed. As fintech infrastructure matures and integration becomes easier, even these holdouts are likely to adopt partnership strategies.

The nature of partnerships is also evolving. Early collaborations were often experimental, with banks testing fintech solutions in limited pilots. Increasingly, fintech partnerships are becoming core to bank strategy, embedded in technology roadmaps and business plans. The distinction between bank and fintech is blurring as both sides adopt characteristics of the other. Banks are becoming more technology-driven, and fintech companies are becoming more regulated. The result is a financial services ecosystem that is more collaborative, more innovative, and better equipped to serve customers than either side could achieve alone.

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BTC supply on centralized exchanges is at a 7-year low

BTC supply on centralized exchanges is at a 7-year low

PANews reported on September 18th that crypto analyst The DeFi Investor wrote on the X platform: "The supply of BTC on centralized exchanges is at its lowest level in seven years. The scale of funds invested by institutions in purchasing Bitcoin in this cycle is incredible."
Share
PANews2025/09/18 09:53
Breaking: CME Group Unveils Solana and XRP Options

Breaking: CME Group Unveils Solana and XRP Options

CME Group launches Solana and XRP options, expanding crypto offerings. SEC delays Solana and XRP ETF approvals, market awaits clarity. Strong institutional demand drives CME’s launch of crypto options contracts. In a bold move to broaden its cryptocurrency offerings, CME Group has officially launched options on Solana (SOL) and XRP futures. Available since October 13, 2025, these options will allow traders to hedge and manage exposure to two of the most widely traded digital assets in the market. The new contracts come in both full-size and micro-size formats, with expiration options available daily, monthly, and quarterly, providing flexibility for a diverse range of market participants. This expansion aligns with the rising demand for innovative products in the crypto space. Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group’s Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products, noted that the new options offer increased flexibility for traders, from institutions to active individual investors. The growing liquidity in Solana and XRP futures has made the introduction of these options a timely move to meet the needs of an expanding market. Also Read: Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple! Rapid Growth in Solana and XRP Futures Trading CME Group’s decision to roll out options on Solana and XRP futures follows the substantial growth in these futures products. Since the launch of Solana futures in March 2025, more than 540,000 contracts, totaling $22.3 billion in notional value, have been traded. In August 2025, Solana futures set new records, with an average daily volume (ADV) of 9,000 contracts valued at $437.4 million. The average daily open interest (ADOI) hit 12,500 contracts, worth $895 million. Similarly, XRP futures, which launched in May 2025, have seen significant adoption, with over 370,000 contracts traded, totaling $16.2 billion. XRP futures also set records in August 2025, with an ADV of 6,600 contracts valued at $385 million and a record ADOI of 9,300 contracts, worth $942 million. Institutional Demand for Advanced Hedging Tools CME Group’s expansion into options is a direct response to growing institutional interest in sophisticated cryptocurrency products. Roman Makarov from Cumberland Options Trading at DRW highlighted the market demand for more varied crypto products, enabling more advanced risk management strategies. Joshua Lim from FalconX also noted that the new options products meet the increasing need for institutional hedging tools for assets like Solana and XRP, further cementing their role in the digital asset space. The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures marks another step toward the maturation of the cryptocurrency market, providing a broader range of tools for managing digital asset exposure. SEC’s Delay on Solana and XRP ETF Approvals While CME Group expands its offerings, the broader market is also watching the progress of Solana and XRP exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed its decisions on multiple crypto-related ETF filings, including those for Solana and XRP. Despite the delay, analysts anticipate approval may be on the horizon. This week, REX Shares and Osprey Funds are expected to launch an XRP ETF that will hold XRP directly and allocate at least 40% of its assets to other XRP-related ETFs. Despite the delays, some analysts believe that approval could come soon, fueling further interest in these assets. The delay by the SEC has left many crypto investors awaiting clarity, but approval of these ETFs could fuel further momentum in the Solana and XRP futures markets. Also Read: Tether CEO Breaks Silence on $117,000 Bitcoin Price – Market Reacts! The post Breaking: CME Group Unveils Solana and XRP Options appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:35
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58