Trump defense secretary 'said the quiet part out loud' about Iran ceasefire

With a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran set in place since Tuesday, the Trump administration is now asserting a total American victory, but according to many analysts, that supposed win is a lot more dubious than the White House claims.

Since the outset of fighting, President Donald Trump and his Cabinet have offered ever-shifting justifications for their war of choice. By just six days in, the Atlantic had counted no less than ten supposed rationales, from disrupting Iran’s nuclear capabilities to fulfilling “God’s purpose.” All told, they boiled down to a vague intention of taking down the Iranian regime and reducing the country’s ability to project power.

But as commentators have noted — including many from the MAGA-sphere — the outcome was in fact a disaster for the U.S., amounting to nothing short of a “surrender” on Trump’s part. As evidence of this, writes the Independent, look no further than the words of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Speaking at a press conference following the ceasefire announcement, Hegseth was asked, “Is this not the regime that was at war with us for 47 years?” The reporter was referencing the fact that not only had Iran’s regime maintained power, but the U.S. had managed to do little more than “replace the Ayatollah Khamenei with another Ayatollah Khamenei.”

In response, Hegseth claimed that Iran is certainly now run by “a new group of people,” noting that many leaders had been killed, “hence why [the new ones] came to the table.” So from the administration’s perspective, “the regime has been changed” because “it has a different interaction with the U.S.”

“So, OK, it’s not changed changed,” wrote the Independent, “as in a different outlook or a different way of governing or a different family in charge… It’s different because it’s the same regime but they agreed to a ceasefire with America after threats (and then declared victory themselves to their own population).”

This is not the first suggestion of the overblown nature of the Trump Administration’s regime change claims. Hegseth himself, later in the press conference, proposed that Iranians could now themselves rise up and tear down the regime. Not only does this ignore intelligence assessments that “anyone trying to revolt in Iran would simply be ‘slaughtered' by a regime showing no signs of cracking,” but it undercuts Hegseth's own assertion that there has been any significant leadership replacement.

• george conway
• noam chomsky
• civil war
• Kayleigh mcenany
• Melania trump
• drudge report
• paul krugman
• Lindsey graham
• Lincoln project
• al franken bill maher
• People of praise
• Ivanka trump
• eric trump