The post Biden’s Bigger Tax Credits Push Rising Healthcare Costs Onto Taxpayers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. High angle view of a Japanese female caregiver doing home finance online on a computer together with her worried elderly patient at his home. getty Two recent surveys of employers suggest that employee health insurance premiums are likely to increase by around 6.5% in 2026. This increase comes at a bad time for consumers, as inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and the labor market is weakening. It is also bad news for taxpayers who subsidize health insurance plans bought on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces since higher costs mean larger taxpayer subsidies. Fortunately, taxpayers will see some relief if Congress allows the expanded premium tax credits implemented during the Biden administration to expire at the end of the year. In 2021, Congress expanded the ACA’s premium tax credits (PTC) as part of the American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Act. Passed on party lines with all Republicans voting against it, the ARPA expanded the tax credits in two ways. First, it eliminated the maximum income limit for subsidy eligibility. Second, it reduced and, in some cases, eliminated the individual premium contribution. Democrats originally sold the expanded PTC as a temporary measure to help people cope with the COVID pandemic, but it was later extended by 2022’s Inflation Reduction Act to the end of 2025. The expanded PTC has cost taxpayers a substantial amount of money. Under the PTC expansion, households earning between 100% and 150% of the federal poverty level are not expected to pay any premiums for their insurance coverage. Prior to the expansion, similar households were expected to have some skin the game, paying between 2% and 4% of their monthly income towards their premium. According to a report from the Economic Policy Innovation Center this requires taxpayers picking up an extra $2,000 per year for… The post Biden’s Bigger Tax Credits Push Rising Healthcare Costs Onto Taxpayers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. High angle view of a Japanese female caregiver doing home finance online on a computer together with her worried elderly patient at his home. getty Two recent surveys of employers suggest that employee health insurance premiums are likely to increase by around 6.5% in 2026. This increase comes at a bad time for consumers, as inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and the labor market is weakening. It is also bad news for taxpayers who subsidize health insurance plans bought on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces since higher costs mean larger taxpayer subsidies. Fortunately, taxpayers will see some relief if Congress allows the expanded premium tax credits implemented during the Biden administration to expire at the end of the year. In 2021, Congress expanded the ACA’s premium tax credits (PTC) as part of the American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Act. Passed on party lines with all Republicans voting against it, the ARPA expanded the tax credits in two ways. First, it eliminated the maximum income limit for subsidy eligibility. Second, it reduced and, in some cases, eliminated the individual premium contribution. Democrats originally sold the expanded PTC as a temporary measure to help people cope with the COVID pandemic, but it was later extended by 2022’s Inflation Reduction Act to the end of 2025. The expanded PTC has cost taxpayers a substantial amount of money. Under the PTC expansion, households earning between 100% and 150% of the federal poverty level are not expected to pay any premiums for their insurance coverage. Prior to the expansion, similar households were expected to have some skin the game, paying between 2% and 4% of their monthly income towards their premium. According to a report from the Economic Policy Innovation Center this requires taxpayers picking up an extra $2,000 per year for…

Biden’s Bigger Tax Credits Push Rising Healthcare Costs Onto Taxpayers

High angle view of a Japanese female caregiver doing home finance online on a computer together with her worried elderly patient at his home.

getty

Two recent surveys of employers suggest that employee health insurance premiums are likely to increase by around 6.5% in 2026. This increase comes at a bad time for consumers, as inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and the labor market is weakening. It is also bad news for taxpayers who subsidize health insurance plans bought on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces since higher costs mean larger taxpayer subsidies. Fortunately, taxpayers will see some relief if Congress allows the expanded premium tax credits implemented during the Biden administration to expire at the end of the year.

In 2021, Congress expanded the ACA’s premium tax credits (PTC) as part of the American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Act. Passed on party lines with all Republicans voting against it, the ARPA expanded the tax credits in two ways. First, it eliminated the maximum income limit for subsidy eligibility. Second, it reduced and, in some cases, eliminated the individual premium contribution. Democrats originally sold the expanded PTC as a temporary measure to help people cope with the COVID pandemic, but it was later extended by 2022’s Inflation Reduction Act to the end of 2025.

The expanded PTC has cost taxpayers a substantial amount of money. Under the PTC expansion, households earning between 100% and 150% of the federal poverty level are not expected to pay any premiums for their insurance coverage. Prior to the expansion, similar households were expected to have some skin the game, paying between 2% and 4% of their monthly income towards their premium. According to a report from the Economic Policy Innovation Center this requires taxpayers picking up an extra $2,000 per year for a family of four earning 150% of the federal poverty level. Higher income households receive even larger benefits from the PTC expansion: A four-person household earning $96,500, or 300% of the federal poverty level, gets an extra premium subsidy of $3,700 per year.

These household subsidies add up. The Urban Institute estimates that the larger PTCs will cause an extra 7.2 million people to get taxpayer-supported ACA coverage. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that a permanent expansion of the PTC would add $383 billion to the federal deficit over 10 years, or nearly $40 billion per year. This is a hard pill to swallow given the country’s already dire fiscal outlook, as the debt-to-GDP ratio is on pace to hit 120% of GDP by 2035, up from 100% today.

In addition to the cost concerns, there is also evidence of fraud in the program. The government gives the tax credits directly to the insurers based on an enrollee’s projected income. During tax season enrollees are supposed to reconcile the income they actually earned throughout the year with the taxpayer subsidies they received, but this does not always happen. According to a report from the Paragon Health Institute, federal law limits the Treasury Department’s ability to recover subsidies if too much money is advanced to the insurer. There is also no repayment mechanism in place for people who misestimated their income to qualify for a subsidy. Paragon estimates that there were 6.4 million improper enrollees in 2025 who received taxpayer subsidies.

There has also been a big spike in enrollees who never make a claim—no doctor visit, lab test, or prescription—which is another sign of fraudulent enrollees. Even though these enrollees do not use any services, taxpayers still pay. In 2024, taxpayers paid insurers $35 billion for people who paid no premiums themselves and never used their plan.

These taxpayer subsidies are not sustainable. The federal government is currently running the largest peacetime deficits in U.S. history—more than $1.8 trillion in 2024 and on pace for a similar amount in 2025. Large deficits crowd out private-sector investment, make things like home and auto loans more expensive, slow economic growth, and contribute to inflation.

What policymakers need to do is find ways to connect people to jobs. If more people had private insurance, they would not need taxpayer subsidies. This means schools and universities that actually teach useful skills to prepare people for meaningful work. We also need to reform our government training programs so they provide a bridge to the market economy. Utah’s one-door model that integrates workforce and safety-net services to help people find jobs is an example other states can learn from.

Finally, we need to reduce the cost of healthcare, not just hide it by pushing it onto taxpayers. Eliminating certificate of need laws that restrict the supply of medical care fosters more competition and helps bring down prices. Reforming scope of practice laws so more nurses and other medical professionals can provide the services they are trained to provide would also help. We could also give people more control over their healthcare spending via universal savings accounts that allow people to save money for healthcare and other expenses tax free. This would encourage folks to shop around for non-emergency care to find the best value.

The Biden-era PTC expansion did not make healthcare cheaper; it just hid the cost. Congress should let the tax credit expansion expire at the end of the year as scheduled. This will save taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars and encourage federal and state officials to pursue policy reforms that will truly make healthcare more affordable.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adammillsap/2025/09/12/bidens-bigger-tax-credits-push-rising-healthcare-costs-onto-taxpayers/

Market Opportunity
SQUID MEME Logo
SQUID MEME Price(GAME)
$32.1312
$32.1312$32.1312
+0.28%
USD
SQUID MEME (GAME) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

The post Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 17:39 Is dogecoin really fading? As traders hunt the best crypto to buy now and weigh 2025 picks, Dogecoin (DOGE) still owns the meme coin spotlight, yet upside looks capped, today’s Dogecoin price prediction says as much. Attention is shifting to projects that blend culture with real on-chain tools. Buyers searching “best crypto to buy now” want shipped products, audits, and transparent tokenomics. That frames the true matchup: dogecoin vs. Pepeto. Enter Pepeto (PEPETO), an Ethereum-based memecoin with working rails: PepetoSwap, a zero-fee DEX, plus Pepeto Bridge for smooth cross-chain moves. By fusing story with tools people can use now, and speaking directly to crypto presale 2025 demand, Pepeto puts utility, clarity, and distribution in front. In a market where legacy meme coin leaders risk drifting on sentiment, Pepeto’s execution gives it a real seat in the “best crypto to buy now” debate. First, a quick look at why dogecoin may be losing altitude. Dogecoin Price Prediction: Is Doge Really Fading? Remember when dogecoin made crypto feel simple? In 2013, DOGE turned a meme into money and a loose forum into a movement. A decade on, the nonstop momentum has cooled; the backdrop is different, and the market is far more selective. With DOGE circling ~$0.268, the tape reads bearish-to-neutral for the next few weeks: hold the $0.26 shelf on daily closes and expect choppy range-trading toward $0.29–$0.30 where rallies keep stalling; lose $0.26 decisively and momentum often bleeds into $0.245 with risk of a deeper probe toward $0.22–$0.21; reclaim $0.30 on a clean daily close and the downside bias is likely neutralized, opening room for a squeeze into the low-$0.30s. Source: CoinMarketcap / TradingView Beyond the dogecoin price prediction, DOGE still centers on payments and lacks native smart contracts; ZK-proof verification is proposed,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:14
US Ranks #1 in CoinGecko Global Meme Coin Interest Report

US Ranks #1 in CoinGecko Global Meme Coin Interest Report

The post US Ranks #1 in CoinGecko Global Meme Coin Interest Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. United States ranks #1 in global meme coin interest, capturing
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 23:49
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36