The post For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good Universal Pictures Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first. Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name. Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’? It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz. If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story. Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood. Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) Getty Images The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today. The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both). Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked. Maguire’s novel aimed to… The post For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good Universal Pictures Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first. Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name. Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’? It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz. If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story. Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood. Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) Getty Images The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today. The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both). Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked. Maguire’s novel aimed to…

For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’

8 min read

Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good

Universal Pictures

Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first.

Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name.

Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’?

It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz.

If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story.

Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood.

Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today.

The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.

With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both).

Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked.

Maguire’s novel aimed to deconstruct the events of The Wizard of Oz, asking how the Wicked Witch came to be viewed as a one-dimensional villain.

Maguire borrowed elements from the Wizard of Oz book and film, creating a morally ambiguous prequel that was never meant to be canon.

Wicked: For Good is a retelling of a familiar tale, with a twist.

What Is The Plot Of The Original ‘Wizard Of Oz’?

The 1939 film sees Dorothy forced out of Kansas after a hurricane lifts her house and drops it into the magical land of Oz.

Dorothy’s house accidently crushes the Wicked Witch of the East, oppressor of the Munchkins, and as a reward, Glinda the Good gives Dorothy the witch’s magical ruby slippers (the slippers appear as silver in Wicked: For Good, which is the color from the original novel).

Dorothy sets off on the Yellow Brick Road to see the Wizard of Oz and find a way home, but makes three friends along the way—the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Cowardly Lion.

The trio all feel that they are lacking something, with Scarecrow seeking a brain, the Tin Man a heart, and the Cowardly Lion, courage.

The Wizard tasks the three with slaying the Wicked Witch of the West. They manage to do so by accident—the Wicked Witch sets fire to Scarecrow and Dorothy throws water to put it out, melting the Wicked Witch into a puddle.

Returning to the Emerald City for their reward, the three uncover the truth about the Wizard—he’s just an ordinary man from Dorothy’s world.

However, the Wizard proves to be a trickster with a heart of gold, giving the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion trinkets which fool them into uncovering the positive traits they had all along.

The Wizard plans to return Dorothy to Kansas with a hot air balloon, but he is lifted into the air without Dorothy after Toto runs away.

Glinda the Good returns to reassure Dorothy that she, just like her companions, had the solution all along, and Dorothy uses the magical slippers to return home.

The film frames the entire trip as a dream, contrary to the novel.

Wicked: For Good inserts a more complex narrative under the surface of Dorothy’s journey.

How ‘Wicked: for Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’

Wicked: For Good creates origin stories for Dorothy’s three companions, and even explains the hurricane that brought her to Kansas as the work of Madame Morrible (Michelle Yeoh).

Warning—spoilers ahead.

The Tin Man

Elphaba visits her disabled sister, Nessarose (Marissa Bode), who rules Munchkinland, and enchants Nessa’s silver slippers as a good deed, enabling her sister to fly.

This backfires after Nessa’s lover, Boq (Ethan Slater) storms out, intimidated by the use of magic.

Nessa then uses the Grimmerie, the powerful spellbook of Oz, to enchant Boq’s heart and make him stay with her forever.

Nessa botches the spell and shrinks his heart, forcing Elphaba to create a desperate curse to save Boq, transforming him into a metal man with no heart—the Tin Man.

The original novel gives the Tin Man a grisly, somewhat similar origin. He falls in love with a servant of the Wicked Witch of the East, and the witch blocks their marriage by cursing his axe, making it cut off a body part with each swing. Over time, his body is replaced piece by piece.

The 1939 film does not give the Tin Man an origin, but he does mention that “the tinsmith forgot to give me a heart,” suggesting that he was built.

Dorothy’s Arrival, And The Scarecrow’s Origin

We only see Dorothy from the back in Wicked: For Good—the protagonist of The Wizard of Oz is flipped into a mysterious agent of chaos who traverses through the land, making huge changes without ever knowing the truth of her actions.

Madame Morrible deliberately creates the tornado and drops Dorothy’s house onto Nessarose, murdering her and leading to Glinda giving the silver slippers to Dorothy.

This enrages Elphaba, resulting in her and Glinda having a physical fight, broken up by Fiyero (Jonathan Bailey), Glinda’s ex-husband and Elphaba’s true love.

Fiyero sacrifices himself to Oz’s guards, allowing Elphaba to escape.

Fiyero is beaten almost to death by the guards and hung on a wooden cross, and again, in desperation, Elphaba uses her magic to protect Fiyero from all bodily harm, transforming him into a Scarecrow.

In the novel, the Scarecrow is just a scarecrow, and describes himself coming into consciousness as a Munchkin farmer creates his body.

The 1939 film does not bother with an origin—the Scarecrow’s romantic backstory with Glinda and Elphaba is solely a Wicked invention.

The Cowardly Lion

The Cowardly Lion (Colman Domingo) first appears as a cub in Wicked, protected by Elphaba. In Wicked: For Good, this good deed is reframed as a disservice, with Elphaba blamed for the lion growing up to be a coward.

It’s unclear if the Cowardly Lion actually believes this, or is too scared to speak up.

In the novel, there is no origin story, nor is the Cowardly Lion ever really afraid. In fact, the novel makes it clear that all three companions excel in the exact qualities they believe they lack, but the 1939 film depicts the Cowardly Lion as very cowardly indeed.

Oz’s repression of the talking animal population is also an invention of Wicked, reframing the Wizard of Oz into a wicked trickster rather than benevolent liar.

The Wizard of Oz

Wicked: For Good depicts the Wizard as a villain and ruthless tyrant, who represses the animal population as a means to seize control.

The twist ending of For Good reveals that the Wizard is actually Elphaba’s father, who “seduced” Elphaba’s mother using a magic potion that resulted in her green skin.

The Wizard is surprised to hear this, and leaves the Land of Oz in shame after Glinda tells him the truth.

The original film and novel take a much more sympathetic approach to the Wizard—he’s a shameless huckster who takes advantage of the naivety of Oz’s citizens, but he’s also a good leader and an inspiration to many.

In later novels (Baum wrote several sequels), the Wizard returns to the story, and his role in Oz’s history is revealed to be more sinister than it first seems, as he displaced the royal family and placed himself as the ruler of the Land.

However, he is never depicted as an outright villain—he’s a kindly trickster, a man who followed his ambition as far as it would go, lying every step of the way.

Wicked: For Good ends with Elphaba reunited with Fiyero, fleeing the Land of Oz by crossing a vast, uninhabited desert. This desert doesn’t appear in The Wizard of Oz, but it is part of Baum’s books, and is known as the Deadly Desert.

The Deadly Desert surrounds Oz, and is covered with sand that kills all those who touch it, which is clearly not part of Wicked canon.

However, the Deadly Desert can be seen in the surprisingly dark sequel to The Wizard of Oz, the 1985 film Return to Oz. If you’ve watched both Wicked films and The Wizard of Oz, give Return to Oz a watch (it’s available to stream on Disney+).

Like Wicked: For Good, Return to Oz is a different take on Baum’s world, and is more faithful to the books than the 1939 film.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesThe Tragic Ending Of ‘Wicked,’ ExplainedForbes‘Wicked’—Ariana Grande And Cynthia Erivo’s ‘Holding Space’ Meme, ExplainedForbesThe AI-Altered ‘Wizard Of Oz’ Controversy, ExplainedForbesDisney Fans Want To Know—What’s The Point Of Live-Action ‘Moana’?

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/11/22/how-wicked-for-good-connects-to-the-wizard-of-oz/

Market Opportunity
Witch Token Logo
Witch Token Price(WITCH)
$0.0353
$0.0353$0.0353
0.00%
USD
Witch Token (WITCH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Today we compare Pepeto (PEPETO), BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe (and how they stack up today) by the main […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:39
Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

BitcoinWorld Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal In a dramatic shift for one of cryptocurrency’s leading networks, Solana (
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/05 06:45