Algunos consejeros dijeron que el INE debe abordar la cuestión del voto electrónico desde una perspectiva más matizada no con argumentos tajantes.Algunos consejeros dijeron que el INE debe abordar la cuestión del voto electrónico desde una perspectiva más matizada no con argumentos tajantes.

Partidos recibirán hasta 147 millones de pesos de militantes en 2026

2025/11/28 14:05
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Pese a la negativa de algunos de sus integrantes, el Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE) confirmó que en estos momentos es inviable poner en marcha el voto electrónico a nivel nacional para las próximas elecciones “debido a que esta modalidad no está considerada en la normatividad aplicable”.

Tras presentar un Informe sobre la viabilidad para que las y los ciudadanos mexicanos residentes en territorio nacional emitan su voto en los próximos procesos electorales por Internet de forma similar a la que las personas mexicanas residentes en el extranjero ejercen su derecho al sufragio.

El INE anunció que se ha intensificado el análisis de la viabilidad del voto electrónico, particularmente del voto por Internet; no obstante, advirtió que es inviable la eventual implementación del voto por Internet en territorio nacional, ya que requiere condiciones normativas, operativas, registrales y tecnológicas que hoy no están plenamente configuradas.

Financiamiento privado

A su vez, el Consejo General del INE avaló los límites para el financiamiento privado a los partidos para el 2026.

El órgano electoral detalló que se permitirá a los partidos políticos nacionales que reciban hasta 147 millones 363,032 pesos, en dinero o en especie, por parte de su militancia y en aportaciones por parte de simpatizantes, en dinero o en especie, el límite será de 66 millones 97,872 pesos y 30 centavos.

Se indicó también que la aportación individual de simpatizantes no podrá superar los tres millones 304,893 pesos y 61 centavos en dinero o especie.

Market Opportunity
ELYSIA Logo
ELYSIA Price(EL)
$0.001863
$0.001863$0.001863
-0.69%
USD
ELYSIA (EL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Share
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Share
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54