Elon Musk’s social media company X (formerly Twitter) has been fined 120 million euros ($140 million) by EU tech regulators. The EU claims that the platform breached its online content rules. According to the EU, under the Digital Services Act, X mislead verified blue checkmarks that deceive users on account authenticity and provide insufficient data […]Elon Musk’s social media company X (formerly Twitter) has been fined 120 million euros ($140 million) by EU tech regulators. The EU claims that the platform breached its online content rules. According to the EU, under the Digital Services Act, X mislead verified blue checkmarks that deceive users on account authenticity and provide insufficient data […]

EU slaps X with €120 million fine for breaking online transparency rules

2025/12/05 23:50

Elon Musk’s social media company X (formerly Twitter) has been fined 120 million euros ($140 million) by EU tech regulators. The EU claims that the platform breached its online content rules.

According to the EU, under the Digital Services Act, X mislead verified blue checkmarks that deceive users on account authenticity and provide insufficient data access for researchers. This stems from an investigation into X’s compliance with DSA transparency rules two years ago.

EU says that DSA has nothing to do with censorship

The bloc’s tech regulator claims that users could be duped into thinking the identity of those with blue tick marks was verified, when in fact anybody can pay for a blue tick. It said it had found evidence of malicious actors abusing the system.

On the other hand, the billionaire, who bought the platform for $44 billion in 2022, said the DSA rules amounted to censored speech, which he said he found unacceptable.

In response to Musk’s charge of censorship, the commission said that its rules were aimed at ensuring “a safe and fair online environment for European citizens that is respectful of their rights, in particular freedom of expression”.

Among its rules, it said, are requirements that companies inform users when their accounts are restricted and that users who are banned can contest those decisions.

Additionally, the Commission said its review of X had found a lack of transparency around advertising and that X did not provide data for research use as required under EU rules. “In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service”, the Commission stated.

The European Commission’s tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, said X’s fine was proportionate and calculated based on the nature of the infringements, their gravity in terms of the affected EU users, and their duration. 

Under the DSA, which took effect two years ago, the bloc can impose fines of up to 6% of online platforms’ yearly global revenue for failing to tackle illegal content and disinformation, or for not following transparency rules.

“We are not here to impose the highest fines. We are here to make sure that our digital legislation is enforced, and if you comply with our rules, you don’t get a fine. And it’s as simple as that,” she stated, “I think it’s very important to underline that DSA is having nothing to do with censorship.” 

The penalty aligns with the EU’s ongoing enforcement against big tech, including prior fines on Meta and Apple. This is pressuring X to potentially overhaul its premium subscription model amid low initial post engagement of 16 likes.

JD Vance asks the EU to support free speech

Besides X, the EU’s investigation has extended to other US companies. Earlier this year, the EU fined Apple and Meta a combined 700 million euros for breaching the bloc’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA).

As reported by Cryptopolitan, Apple was hit with a € 500 million ($570 million) penalty for restricting how app developers communicate with users about alternative sales and offers. Meta, on the other hand, was fined € 200 million (approximately $230 million) for its controversial “pay or consent” model. It forces users in the EU to either pay for ad-free access to Facebook and Instagram or consent to targeted advertising.

Europe’s crackdown on big tech has been interpreted as a way to ensure smaller rivals can compete, and consumers have more choice. This has been criticised by the administration of US President Donald Trump, which says it singles out American companies and censors Americans. 

Before the announcement of the fine, the US Vice President JD Vance said, “The EU should be supporting free speech, not attacking American companies over garbage.”

However, the EU’s executive said that its laws do not target any nationality and that it is merely defending its digital and democratic standards, which usually serve as the benchmark for the rest of the world. 

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

‘Justice for Celeste’ tokens spark outrage: Tribute or exploitation?

‘Justice for Celeste’ tokens spark outrage: Tribute or exploitation?

The post ‘Justice for Celeste’ tokens spark outrage: Tribute or exploitation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The death of 15-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez has gripped social media after her decomposed body was discovered in the trunk of singer D4vd’s car. Screenshots circulating online allege the artist had been grooming her since she was 12, causing widespread outrage and calls for justice. As police continue investigating and have yet to confirm the case as homicide, the crypto world hit a new low. Source: DexScreener Dozens of “Justice for Celeste” memecoins have appeared on decentralized exchanges, with some climbing to nearly $1 million in market cap and millions in daily trading volume. The top token crossed a $432K market cap at press time, with over $3 million in 24-hour volume, surging 348% despite dropping 16% in the last hour. Other versions had market caps ranging from $340K to $463K, though some experienced sharp intraday losses exceeding 24%.  One newer variant surged 615% in a single day, backed by $275K in trading volume, while another recorded a staggering $1.7 million in trades within just 33 minutes of its launch. Is it really the thought that counts? Not everyone sees these tokens as a tribute, and rightly so. After news spread that one CELESTE team had tracked down the victim’s mother in Mexico to arrange donations, social media reactions turned sharply divided. Supporters framed it as a genuine way to provide financial help, while critics accused the project of doxxing and exploiting grief for profit. Source: X One user called the entire effort “slimey and gross,” arguing it was more about marketing and trading gains than justice. Memecoin market ends the week in green Stepping back from the controversy, the broader memecoin market has actually had a strong week. Heavyweights like Dogecoin [DOGE], Shiba Inu [SHIB], and Pepe [PEPE] all posted steady gains, while newer names like MemeCore [M] and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 11:56