TLDRs; Appeals court rules against Apple, questioning legality of its 27% off-store App Store commission. Epic Games gains key victory as Apple faces scrutiny overTLDRs; Appeals court rules against Apple, questioning legality of its 27% off-store App Store commission. Epic Games gains key victory as Apple faces scrutiny over

Apple Loses Appeal in Epic App Store Battle, Court Challenges 27% Off-Store Commission

2025/12/12 19:19

TLDRs;

  • Appeals court rules against Apple, questioning legality of its 27% off-store App Store commission.
  • Epic Games gains key victory as Apple faces scrutiny over external payment restrictions.
  • Apple may have to revise App Store fees, impacting developers and revenue streams.
  • Court instructs trial judge to reconsider Apple’s commission structure following previous injunction violations.

Apple has suffered a significant legal setback as a U.S. federal appeals court ruled against the tech giant in its long-running dispute with Epic Games over App Store policies. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that Apple violated a prior court injunction by enforcing a 27% commission on transactions conducted outside the App Store.

The ruling upholds a lower court’s contempt finding against Apple and directs the trial judge to reassess the commission rates Apple can legally charge developers using its intellectual property. The decision marks a pivotal moment in a dispute that has persisted for over five years, reflecting ongoing tensions over app marketplace control and developer freedom.

Epic Games Challenges Apple’s Monopoly

Epic Games has long argued that Apple’s App Store practices restrict competition by limiting how developers can direct users to alternative payment methods. Apple’s commission structure, typically ranging from 15% to 30% for most in-app purchases, has been criticized for stifling innovation and maintaining a monopolistic hold over iOS app transactions.

The court’s decision strengthens Epic’s position and raises questions about the potential for reduced App Store fees or increased flexibility for developers. Legal experts suggest that the ruling may encourage more companies to push for alternative payment solutions, potentially reshaping how digital purchases are processed on Apple devices.

Regulatory Pressure and Global Precedents

While the appeals court’s decision casts doubt on Apple’s off-store commission, past regulatory actions indicate that any immediate changes may be moderate. In South Korea, Apple imposes a 26% commission on third-party payments, while Dutch dating apps face a 27% rate, both under regulatory oversight.

Meanwhile, Google’s “user choice billing” program allows Android developers to reduce fees by around 4 percentage points, though conversion friction often offsets these savings. In the European Union, Apple’s Digital Markets Act-compliant rates range from 10% to 17%, plus a €0.50 Core Technology Fee per first annual install exceeding one million downloads.

Experts argue that even with legal adjustments, Apple is likely to maintain revenue-protecting mechanisms such as distinct app binaries, audits, and complex fee structures.

Potential Impact on Payments and Subscriptions

A reduction in Apple’s commission could shift significant spending from in-app purchases to external payment methods, benefiting payment processors and subscription platforms. Consumer spending on non-game apps across iOS and Google Play reached $19.2 billion in Q4 2024, with productivity apps up 46% and finance apps nearing 7.5 billion downloads.

TikTok alone generated approximately $1.9 billion in in-app revenue during the same period. If off-store fees decrease meaningfully, developers may redirect users to web-based checkouts, boosting revenue opportunities for platforms that facilitate app-to-web transactions. The streaming and social media sectors, which collectively amassed over $23 billion in spending in 2024, could also see growing use of alternative payment solutions.

The ruling underscores the continuing tension between major tech platforms and regulators, as courts, lawmakers, and developers increasingly push for a more competitive digital marketplace. While Apple may appeal or adjust its policies strategically, the decision signals that App Store practices will remain under intense scrutiny in the years ahead.

The post Apple Loses Appeal in Epic App Store Battle, Court Challenges 27% Off-Store Commission appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Slate Milk Raises $23 Million Series B Round To Bolster Protein Drink’s Rapid Growth

Slate Milk Raises $23 Million Series B Round To Bolster Protein Drink’s Rapid Growth

The post Slate Milk Raises $23 Million Series B Round To Bolster Protein Drink’s Rapid Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Slate Classic Chocolate milk shake Slate A new slate of functional beverages is about to dominate the ready-to-drink shelf, ushering in a more modern era of easily incorporating more protein in our diets. Today, Slate Milk cofounders Manny Lubin and Josh Belinsky reveal the brand has raised a $23 million Series B funding round. Led by Foundership, a new fund by Yasso frozen greek yogurt cofounders Drew Harrington and Amanda Klane, the money will allow Slate to continue its momentum towards ubiquity as it hits 100,000 points of distribution across 20,000 stores nationwide by the end of 2025. Slate also reveals that it is rolling out several line extensions including a 20 gram protein Strawberry milk at Sprouts Farmers Market, a 30 gram protein Cookies & Cream milk at Target, and a 30 gram protein Salted Caramel flavor at Walmart and Albertsons banner stores. New “Ultra” 42 gram protein options in Chocolate, Vanilla and Salted Caramel will also be available in retailers across the country. “Stores where we may have just had our ready-to-drink lattes, now we’re adding our shakes, and vice versa. We’re adding new partners and executing deeper with our existing partners,” Lubin tells me. The impressive growth is due to Slate’s early entry into the high-protein product space slightly before it caught mainstream attention–ready to execute immediately once consumers craved it most. Slate’s macronutrient ratios are practically unbeatable, largely due to the utilization of ultra-filtered milk. It’s a protein drink that writes a new script about who protein drinks are for. “We’re not sons of dairy farmers. We had no milk history,” Lubin says “We’re just a couple of dudes from the burbs of Boston who like chocolate milk.” Slate cofounder Manny Lubin Slate Another Clean Slate Slate’s brand has evolved significantly in just the past six…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 03:08