The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted conditional approval to five major cryptocurrency companies on December 12, 2025, allowing themThe U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted conditional approval to five major cryptocurrency companies on December 12, 2025, allowing them

Five Crypto Companies Win Federal Banking Approval in Historic Regulatory Shift

2025/12/14 04:00

This marks one of the most significant regulatory developments in crypto history, bringing digital asset firms under the same federal oversight as traditional financial institutions.

The approved companies are Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos. Circle and Ripple received brand new charters, while BitGo, Fidelity, and Paxos converted their existing state-level trust companies into national trust banks.

Why This Matters

National trust bank charters give crypto companies a major advantage. Instead of navigating different rules in each state, they can now operate under a single federal framework across all 50 states. They gain direct supervision by the OCC, the federal agency that oversees more than 1,000 national banks holding over $17 trillion in assets.

These charters allow the companies to offer digital asset custody services and conduct fiduciary activities. However, they cannot accept deposits, make loans, or offer FDIC insurance like traditional banks.

Source: @sytaylor

OCC Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould, who took office in July 2025, said the approvals are “good for consumers, the banking industry and the economy.” Gould previously served as the OCC’s chief counsel during the first Trump administration, when the agency chartered the first crypto banks.

The Five Companies

Circle received approval for its First National Digital Currency Bank. The company issues USDC, a stablecoin with a $78 billion market cap. Circle went public in May 2025 and plans to use the charter to oversee its USDC reserves and provide custody services for institutional clients.

Ripple gained approval for Ripple National Trust Bank. The company issues the RLUSD stablecoin worth $1.3 billion. Interestingly, Ripple’s charter explicitly states it will not issue RLUSD through the trust bank. CEO Brad Garlinghouse called the approval a “massive step forward” and criticized traditional bank lobbyists for anti-competitive tactics.

Paxos converted its state charter to become Paxos Trust Company, National Association. Unlike Ripple, Paxos received explicit permission to issue stablecoins under federal oversight. CEO Charles Cascarilla said the company is “excited to power a platform subject to federal oversight and supervision.”

BitGo, based in South Dakota, converted its existing charter to federal status. The company holds about $90 billion in crypto assets under custody and filed for an IPO in September 2025. BitGo reported revenue of $4.19 billion in the first half of 2025, up from $1.12 billion during the same period in 2024.

Fidelity Digital Assets also converted from a state charter to national status, joining its sister companies under federal banking regulation.

The GENIUS Act Connection

These approvals follow the passage of the GENIUS Act, which President Trump signed into law on July 18, 2025. The law creates the first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins.

The GENIUS Act passed with strong bipartisan support—68 to 30 in the Senate and 308 to 122 in the House. It requires stablecoin issuers to back every dollar of their digital currency with liquid assets like U.S. dollars or Treasury bills. The law also gives the OCC authority to supervise nonbank stablecoin issuers.

Circle filed its application on June 30, 2025, while Ripple applied in July 2025. The OCC has a 120-day review period for charter applications under the new law.

A Surge in Applications

The crypto charter rush reflects changing attitudes toward digital assets. The OCC received 14 charter applications in 2025 alone. From 2011 through 2024, the agency averaged fewer than four applications per year.

Other major crypto companies have filed applications that are still pending, including Coinbase, Bridge (owned by Stripe), and Crypto.com. These companies were not included in the December 12 approvals.

Anchorage Digital became the first federally chartered crypto bank in January 2021. CEO Nathan McCauley welcomed the new approvals, saying his company “never wanted to be the last.”

Banking Industry Pushback

Not everyone supports bringing crypto companies into the federal banking system. The Bank Policy Institute, which represents major banks, questioned whether the OCC’s requirements are “appropriately tailored to the activities and risks” these companies face.

Traditional banking groups have fought against crypto charter applications throughout 2025. In September, three banking trade groups representing $234 trillion in assets asked regulators to limit crypto custody to traditional banks only. The Independent Community Bankers of America has filed complaints against several crypto firms seeking federal charters.

Ripple’s Garlinghouse directly addressed this opposition, stating that critics have “complained that crypto isn’t playing by the same rules, but here’s the crypto industry—directly under the OCC’s supervision and standards—prioritizing compliance, trust and innovation.”

What Happens Next

These are conditional approvals, meaning the companies must meet specific OCC requirements before becoming fully operational national trust banks. Once they satisfy all conditions, they will join approximately 60 existing national trust banks regulated by the OCC.

The approvals represent a dramatic policy shift under the Trump administration. Jonathan Gould, who has experience with both traditional finance and crypto (he previously worked as chief legal officer at Bitfury Group), is leading the OCC’s crypto-friendly approach.

For crypto companies, federal charters provide regulatory clarity and could boost institutional confidence. For traditional banks, these approvals signal increased competition in custody and digital asset services.

The Road Ahead

The December 12 approvals mark a turning point in how the United States regulates digital assets. By bringing stablecoin issuers and crypto custodians into the federal banking system, regulators are betting that clear rules will protect consumers better than keeping these companies in a regulatory gray zone.

Whether this approach succeeds will depend on how well these new trust banks operate under OCC supervision and whether they can deliver on promises of compliance and consumer protection. With billions of dollars in stablecoins already circulating and institutional adoption growing, the stakes have never been higher for getting crypto regulation right.

Market Opportunity
WINK Logo
WINK Price(WIN)
$0.00003112
$0.00003112$0.00003112
-6.85%
USD
WINK (WIN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41