Something huge just shifted in digital money and most crypto holders are still trading memes while the real disruption moves quietly on chain. JPMorgan just broughtSomething huge just shifted in digital money and most crypto holders are still trading memes while the real disruption moves quietly on chain. JPMorgan just brought

Banks Just Declared War On Stablecoins And Crypto Has No Idea What Is Coming

2025/12/16 16:23

Something huge just shifted in digital money and most crypto holders are still trading memes while the real disruption moves quietly on chain. JPMorgan just brought its $10 trillion per day payments machine into the same arena as USDC and USDT, but under rules that let it do 1 thing the stablecoin giants legally cannot: share the yield. This is not another altcoin narrative. This is the start of a structural fight over who gets to earn interest on trillions of tokenized dollars and who gets left holding non yielding bags.

JPM Coin, branded as JPMD on Coinbase’s Base network, is not a classic stablecoin. It is a tokenized bank deposit that sits directly on JPMorgan’s balance sheet as a claim on real bank money, and it can pay you normal bank interest while it sits in an approved wallet. JPMorgan describes JPMD as a USD deposit token for institutional clients that represents actual deposits and supports near instant transfers on Base 24/7. Deposits in JPMD earn interest the same way a regular institutional account would, with the twist that now those balances move across a public L2 instead of through closed bank rails. The crucial point is legal status: this is deposit money, not a money market style stablecoin, so interest to holders is expected, not forbidden.

Circle and Tether are stuck in a different legal box. USDC is structured as a fully reserved stablecoin, with Circle holding almost all reserves in cash and short term Treasuries and keeping the yield on those reserves as its primary business model. In Q3, Circle generated about $740 million in revenue and reserve income, with roughly 96% of that coming from interest on the Treasuries and cash that back USDC rather than from fees or subscriptions. That income flows to Circle’s bottom line because stablecoin frameworks and their own disclosures commit them to 1:1 redeemability and full collateralization, not to passing through interest to token holders. Tether’s model is similar: high yield on reserves, no yield for you.

That setup worked as long as banks were clumsy, regulators were hostile and tokenized dollars lived mostly outside the regulated core. Now the board has flipped. JPMorgan has turned JPMD into a bridge from its internal ledger to Base, effectively treating a public blockchain as an extension of its global cash management franchise. The bank processes about $10 trillion in traditional payments every day, and even a small fraction of that moving as tokenized deposits instantly creates a liquidity ocean that no standalone stablecoin issuer can match. Because these are regulated deposits, JPMorgan can legally offer rates like 4% on tokenized balances, while Circle and Tether cannot write “we will pay you 4% on USDC or USDT” without detonating their regulatory status.

This is where the “second stablecoin war” really begins. The first war pitted USDC against USDT in a race for mindshare, liquidity and integrations. Both sides played the same game: promise 1:1 backing, keep the yield from Treasuries, and fight on transparency, exchange listings and ecosystem deals. The new war is different. It is banks versus stablecoin issuers, with asymmetric weapons. Banks can tokenize insured deposits, plug directly into DeFi rails through permissioned wallets, and legally share the interest stream with customers. Stablecoins are locked into a non interest bearing structure where all that yield accrues to the issuer, not the holder.

Regulators are helping to tilt the field. New US rules created clear categories for “stablecoins” versus “deposit tokens” and encouraged highly regulated banks to issue tokenized money instead of letting non bank issuers dominate dollar rails. JPMorgan’s own white papers argue that bank issued deposit tokens are safer than independent stablecoins because they come with existing prudential oversight and, in many cases, deposit insurance. Once those same banks are allowed to pay competitive yields on tokenized balances, they can undercut Circle’s and Tether’s silent tax on users, where every $1 of stablecoin you hold is a free loan that lets the issuer keep the interest.

Circle’s financials show exactly what is at stake. When 96% of revenue comes from interest on reserves, any move that forces them to share that interest with users or compete with yield bearing bank tokens directly attacks the core economics of the business. A world where major banks offer 4% on tokenized deposits on public chains is a world where holding non yielding USDC or USDT starts to look like leaving rewards unclaimed. For trading firms, treasurers and DeFi protocols, the rational move is obvious: migrate collateral and settlement balances toward instruments that pay, provided they can still plug into the same on chain infrastructure.

The legal line is brutal in its simplicity: only 1 side can share the revenue. Bank issued deposit tokens like JPMD can pay interest as normal deposits while living on a public blockchain. Classical stablecoins like USDC and USDT are designed to be fully collateralized, non interest bearing claims whose issuers sit on the yield. That means the “second war” is not about branding or chain choice, it is about whether the future of on chain dollars belongs to highly regulated institutions that are finally stepping into crypto’s backyard or to the crypto native issuers that built the first generation of digital dollars but now cannot legally match the new offer. If banks win and absorb the yield business at scale, Circle and Tether do not just lose market share. They lose the economic engine that made stablecoins such a profitable corner of crypto in the first place.

Originally published at https://coinbasecorridor.blogspot.com on December 16, 2025.


Banks Just Declared War On Stablecoins And Crypto Has No Idea What Is Coming was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

BitcoinWorld Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon? The financial world is buzzing with discussions around the future of monetary policy, and a recent statement from a key Federal Reserve official has added fuel to the fire. Investors, businesses, and consumers alike are keenly watching for signals regarding potential Fed interest rate cuts and their broader economic implications. What’s Driving Talk of Fed Interest Rate Cuts? Neel Kashkari, the president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, recently made headlines by stating his belief that two additional Fed interest rate cuts would be appropriate this year. This isn’t the first time Kashkari has shared this perspective; he expressed a similar view back in August. His comments offer a glimpse into the ongoing internal debates and varying outlooks among policymakers regarding the optimal path for the nation’s economy. Understanding the context behind such statements is crucial. The Federal Reserve uses interest rates as a primary tool to manage inflation and support employment. When inflation is high, the Fed typically raises rates to cool down economic activity. Conversely, when economic growth slows or inflation targets are met, the Fed might consider cutting rates to stimulate spending and investment. How Do Fed Interest Rate Cuts Impact You? The prospect of Fed interest rate cuts carries significant weight for everyone. For instance, lower interest rates generally translate to: Cheaper Borrowing: Mortgages, car loans, and credit card interest rates can decrease, making it more affordable for consumers to borrow money. This can encourage home buying and larger purchases. Business Investment: Companies find it less expensive to borrow for expansion, new projects, and hiring, potentially boosting economic growth and job creation. Stock Market Performance: Lower rates can make bonds less attractive, pushing investors towards stocks, which might see increased valuations. This can also signal a more optimistic economic outlook. Savings Account Returns: On the flip side, interest rates on savings accounts and Certificates of Deposit (CDs) might also fall, offering lower returns for savers. These ripple effects touch various sectors, from housing to retail, and even extend into the cryptocurrency markets, where investor sentiment is often influenced by broader economic conditions and liquidity. Navigating the Economic Landscape: Why Are Policymakers Divided on Fed Interest Rate Cuts? While some policymakers, like Kashkari, see the appropriateness of multiple Fed interest rate cuts, others may hold different views. The Federal Reserve’s decisions are complex, balancing the need to control inflation with the goal of maintaining maximum employment. Key factors influencing these decisions include: Inflation Data: The pace at which inflation is returning to the Fed’s 2% target is a primary concern. Sustained progress is needed. Employment Figures: A strong job market might give the Fed more leeway to keep rates higher for longer, whereas signs of weakness could prompt cuts. Global Economic Conditions: International economic trends and geopolitical events can also influence the Fed’s domestic policy decisions. Market Expectations: The Fed also considers how financial markets are pricing in future rate movements, aiming to avoid undue volatility. The path forward is rarely straightforward, and the Fed’s approach is often described as data-dependent, meaning decisions can shift as new economic information becomes available. The Outlook for Future Fed Interest Rate Cuts Kashkari’s consistent view on two Fed interest rate cuts this year provides an important perspective, but it’s essential to remember that he is one voice among many on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The committee as a whole determines monetary policy through a consensus-driven process. As the year progresses, market participants will be closely monitoring upcoming inflation reports, employment data, and official Fed statements for further clarity. The timing and magnitude of any potential rate adjustments will significantly shape the economic environment, influencing everything from investment strategies to everyday household budgets. In summary: Neel Kashkari’s consistent advocacy for two Fed interest rate cuts this year highlights a potential shift in monetary policy. These cuts, if they materialize, could offer relief to borrowers, stimulate economic activity, and impact various markets. However, the ultimate decision rests with the broader Federal Reserve committee, which weighs a multitude of economic indicators before acting. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does it mean when the Fed cuts interest rates? When the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, it generally means they are reducing the cost for banks to borrow money. This, in turn, often leads to lower interest rates for consumers and businesses on loans like mortgages, car loans, and credit cards, aiming to stimulate economic activity. Q2: Why would the Fed consider two Fed interest rate cuts this year? The Fed might consider two interest rate cuts if they believe inflation is consistently moving towards their 2% target, or if there are signs of slowing economic growth that could benefit from stimulation. Policymakers like Kashkari may feel the current rates are too restrictive given the economic outlook. Q3: How quickly do Fed interest rate cuts affect the economy? The effects of Fed interest rate cuts can be seen relatively quickly in financial markets, but they typically take several months to fully filter through to the broader economy, impacting consumer spending, business investment, and inflation. Q4: Will Fed interest rate cuts impact my cryptocurrency investments? While not a direct impact, Fed interest rate cuts can indirectly affect cryptocurrency markets. Lower traditional interest rates might make riskier assets like cryptocurrencies more attractive to investors seeking higher returns. Additionally, a more liquid and stimulated economy can sometimes boost overall market sentiment, benefiting crypto assets. Q5: Who is Neel Kashkari? Neel Kashkari is the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. He is one of the twelve regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents who contribute to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) discussions, which set the nation’s monetary policy. Did you find this article insightful? Share your thoughts and help others understand the potential impact of future Fed decisions! You can share this article on your favorite social media platforms. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon? first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 19:35
US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams

US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams

The post US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Crypto scams are getting faster, smarter and
Share
CoinPedia2025/12/17 18:33
Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg

Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg

Bloomberg exposes Crypto.com’s 2023 user data leak. The perpetrators used phishing to access employee accounts, compromising privacy. A data breach that occurred in 2023 at Crypto.com compromised the personal information of its users, according to a disclosure by Bloomberg.  The hacking was planned by a well-known hacker organization known as Scattered Spider.  This team was […] The post Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/23 03:00