The post Crypto Market Volume Hits Six-Month Low — Why It Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While analysts have mainly focused on Bitcoin or individualThe post Crypto Market Volume Hits Six-Month Low — Why It Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While analysts have mainly focused on Bitcoin or individual

Crypto Market Volume Hits Six-Month Low — Why It Matters

While analysts have mainly focused on Bitcoin or individual altcoins, the structure of the total crypto market capitalization is approaching a critical threshold in January.

Signs of weakening liquidity are sending warnings about how fragile this structure has become.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Crypto Trading Volume Plunges as Investors Cash Out

According to data from Newhedge, total trading volume on centralized exchanges reached $1.118 trillion in January. Binance accounted for more than $490 billion of that amount.

What stands out is that unless a significant rebound occurs in the remaining days of January, this figure will mark the lowest level since July last year. The decline in overall market volume provides strong evidence that investors have become increasingly cautious.

Cryptocurrency Monthly Exchange Volume. Source: Newhedge

This cautious sentiment has made investors hesitant to buy, even though many altcoins remain 70–90% below their peak prices.

Another dataset from CryptoQuant offers additional clarity. Retail Investor Demand measures small-scale on-chain trading activity (transactions below $10,000). This indicator has dropped sharply since August last year.

Bitcoin: Retail Investor Demand 30D Change. Source: CryptoQuant

Analyst Caueconomy noted that the risk of a potential US government shutdown, combined with concerns surrounding the yen carry trade, has pushed investors into a defensive stance. Trading activity and new investments have been reduced.

Sponsored

Sponsored

In addition, investors have not only become more cautious with capital allocation, but also appear to be cashing out of the market entirely. Stablecoin data reflects this shift.

CryptoQuant’s ERC-20 stablecoin market cap data shows that stablecoin capitalization declined in January. Stablecoin reserves held on exchanges also dropped significantly.

Stablecoin Market Cap (ERC-20) and Exchange Reserves. Source: CryptoQuant

The total supply of ERC-20 stablecoins and the amount held on exchanges represent capital effectively “waiting” in the crypto market. When both balances decline simultaneously, it signals that funds are leaving the market rather than simply rotating internally.

Sponsored

Sponsored

A recent BeInCrypto report suggested that without fresh liquidity, Bitcoin could potentially fall below $70,000.

How is The Market Cap Structure Being Threatened?

Total crypto market capitalization fell below $3 trillion in January. Several analysts have highlighted the importance of the support level around $2.86 trillion. If this support breaks, market capitalization could decline much further.

TradingView data shows that the market cap is now approaching a trendline that has held since 2024. A breakdown below this trendline could trigger a bear market similar to 2022.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Crypto Market Capitalization. Source: TradingView

As a result, the negative signals from declining trading volume, combined with investor cash-out activity, may increase the likelihood that this trendline will break.

However, the market is also entering a week filled with major macroeconomic events that could shift this trajectory. The US dollar has fallen to its lowest level in four years, largely driven by expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts and renewed trade policy uncertainty.

Historically, a weaker dollar has supported risk assets like cryptocurrencies by increasing global liquidity and making dollar-denominated assets more attractive to international investors. If this trend continues, it could provide the catalyst needed to reverse the current capital outflow.

Still, the path forward remains uncertain. For a sustained recovery, the market would need to see not just a favorable macro backdrop, but also a return of retail participation and fresh stablecoin inflows—neither of which has materialized yet.

The coming days will be critical. If the $2.86 trillion support level holds and macroeconomic conditions remain favorable, the market may stabilize. But if trading volume continues to decline and investors keep withdrawing funds, a deeper correction could follow.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/sharp-decline-in-spot-volume-in-jan/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00