An Ethereum investor has lost more than $12 million due to a complex address poisoning scam, showing the risks associated with convenience-focused transactions An Ethereum investor has lost more than $12 million due to a complex address poisoning scam, showing the risks associated with convenience-focused transactions

Ethereum Whale Loses $12.4 Million to Crypto Attack. Here’s What Happened

3 min read

An Ethereum investor has lost more than $12 million due to a complex address poisoning scam, showing the risks associated with convenience-focused transactions in the crypto space. The user accidentally transferred 4,556 ETH, which is valued at approximately $12.4 million, to a malicious wallet that appeared legitimate.

How the Scam Worked

According to Lookonchain, the scammer created a fake wallet address that closely matched a trusted recipient, using the same first and last four characters as Galaxy Digital’s actual deposit address. Small “dust” transactions were sent to the victim’s wallet to make the spoofed address appear familiar within the transaction history.

The Ethereum user, who frequently sends funds to the legitimate recipient, copied the address from their transaction history without verifying it in full. Due to the fraudulent address being nearly identical, the user did not notice the difference and sent the entire balance to the hacker.

This type of attack, known as an address poisoning scam, is growing in the crypto ecosystem. Scammers rely on users’ everyday behavior—and the potential of not carrying out meticulous verification for an action that is familiar—to execute large-scale thefts. 

A similar case was reported in December 2025, another investor lost $50 million after copying a spoofed address. In that incident, a small test transfer of $50 was manipulated by the attacker to trick the user into sending the remaining balance to the fraudulent wallet.

Caution For Cryptocurrency Users

The incident highlights the importance of exercising extreme caution when sending crypto funds. Users are advised not to rely solely on copying addresses from previous transactions or partial verification based on familiar characters. Full address verification is highly necessary because scammers are relying on partial verifications. 

Experts also recommend sending large amounts in smaller instalments rather than a single transaction. Mark Huber, a crypto user responding to the recent loss, stated that for large transfers, he would divide the total sum into smaller transactions of manageable amounts to reduce risk.

Other safety measures include using ENS domains, wallet address books, or dedicated verification tools to confirm the legitimacy of the recipient’s address. These practices can help prevent the loss of significant funds to address poisoning or other forms of wallet spoofing.

This incident is evidence that even experienced investors can fall victim to scams, especially address poisoning attacks. While copying addresses and prioritizing speed may seem convenient, it can result in devastating financial losses that may never be fully realized. Careful verification and cautious transaction practices cannot be overemphasized for anyone handling substantial cryptocurrency holdings.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

The post Ethereum Whale Loses $12.4 Million to Crypto Attack. Here’s What Happened appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion

The post Tom Lee’s BitMine Hits 7-Month Stock Low as Ethereum Paper Losses Reach $8 Billion appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Shares of BitMine Immersion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/06 04:47
Crypto-Fueled Rekt Drinks Sells 1 Millionth Can Amid MoonPay Collab

Crypto-Fueled Rekt Drinks Sells 1 Millionth Can Amid MoonPay Collab

The post Crypto-Fueled Rekt Drinks Sells 1 Millionth Can Amid MoonPay Collab appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Rekt Brands sold its 1 millionth can of its Rekt Drinks flavored sparkling water. The Web3 firm collaborated with payments infrastructure company MoonPay on a peach-raspberry flavor called “Moon Crush.” Rekt incentivizes purchasers of its drinks with the REKT token, which hit an all-time high market cap of $583 million in August. Web3 consumer firm Rekt Brands sold its 1 millionth can of its Rekt Drinks sparkling water on Friday, surpassing its first major milestone with the sold-out drop of its “Moon Crush” flavor—a peach raspberry-flavored collaboration with payments infrastructure firm MoonPay.  The sale follows Rekt’s previous sellout collaborations with leading Web3 brands like Solana DeFi protocol Jupiter, Ethereum layer-2 network Abstract, and Coinbase’s layer-2 network, Base. Rekt has already worked with a number of crypto-native brands, but says it has been choosy when cultivating collabs. “We have received a large amount of incoming enquiries from some of crypto’s biggest brands, but it’s super important for us to be selective in order to maintain the premium feel of Rekt,” Rekt Brands co-founder and CEO Ovie Faruq told Decrypt.  (Disclosure: Ovie Faruq’s Canary Labs is an investor in DASTAN, the parent company of Decrypt.) “We look to work with brands who are able to form partnerships that we feel are truly strategic to Rekt’s goal of becoming one of the largest global beverage brands,” he added. In particular, Faruq highlighted MoonPay’s role as a “gateway” between non-crypto and crypto users as a reason the collaboration made “perfect sense.”  “We’re thrilled to bring something to life that is both delicious and deeply connected to the crypto community,” MoonPay President Keith Grossman told Decrypt.  Rekt Brands has been bridging the gap between Web3 and the real world with sales of its sparkling water since November 2024. In its first sale,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 09:24
Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today – A First for U.S. Investors

Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today – A First for U.S. Investors

Beginning September 18, investors are expected to be able to buy exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied directly to XRP and Dogecoin, […] The post Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today – A First for U.S. Investors appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 14:35