The post The 2-Second Crypto Laundering Shockwave appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto hackers are now moving stolen funds in as little as two seconds afterThe post The 2-Second Crypto Laundering Shockwave appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto hackers are now moving stolen funds in as little as two seconds after

The 2-Second Crypto Laundering Shockwave

Crypto hackers are now moving stolen funds in as little as two seconds after an attack begins. In most cases, they shift assets before victims even disclose the breach. 

That is the clearest finding from Global Ledger’s 2025 analysis of 255 crypto hacks worth $4.04 billion.

Sponsored

Sponsored

The speed is striking. According to Global Ledger, 76% of hacks saw funds move before public disclosure, rising to 84.6% in the second half of the year. 

How Fast Crypto Hackers Move Stolen Funds. Source: Global Ledger

This means attackers often act before exchanges, analytics firms, or law enforcement can coordinate a response.

However, speed tells only part of the story.

While first transfers are now near-instant, full laundering takes longer. 

On average, hackers needed about 10.6 days in the second half of 2025 to reach final deposit points such as exchanges or mixers, up from roughly eight days earlier in the year. 

In short, the sprint is faster, but the marathon is slower.

Sponsored

Sponsored

This shift reflects improved monitoring after disclosure. Once incidents go public, exchanges and blockchain analytics firms label addresses and increase scrutiny. 

As a result, attackers break funds into smaller pieces and route them through multiple layers before attempting cash-out. 

Hacking Speed Increased, but Crypto Laundering Speed Became Slower. Source: Global Ledger

Sponsored

Sponsored

Bridges, Mixers, and the Long Road to Cash-Out

Bridges have become the main highway for that process. Nearly half of all stolen funds, about $2.01 billion, moved through cross-chain bridges. 

That is more than three times the amount routed via mixers or privacy protocols. In the Bybit case alone, 94.91% of stolen funds flowed through bridges.

At the same time, Tornado Cash regained prominence. The protocol appeared in 41.57% of hacks in 2025. Its usage share jumped sharply in the second half of the year, following sanctions changes cited in the report.

State of Crypto Theft and Money Laundering. Source: Global Ledger 

Meanwhile, direct cash-outs to centralized exchanges fell sharply in the second half. DeFi platforms received a rising share of stolen funds. Attackers appear to avoid obvious off-ramps until attention fades.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Notably, nearly half of all stolen funds remained unspent at the time of analysis. That leaves billions sitting in wallets, potentially waiting for future laundering attempts.

The scale of the problem remains severe. Ethereum accounted for $2.44 billion in losses, or 60.64% of the total. 

Overall, $4.04 billion was stolen across 255 incidents.

Yet recovery remains limited. Only about 9.52% of funds were frozen, and 6.52% were returned.

Taken together, the findings show a clear pattern. Attackers now operate at machine speed in the first seconds after a breach. 

Defenders respond later, forcing criminals into slower, staged laundering strategies. The race has not ended. It has simply entered a new phase—measured in seconds at the start, and days at the finish.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/crypto-2-second-laundering-era-report/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
Trump caves on his own snubs as retaliation ploy against Dem governors backfires

Trump caves on his own snubs as retaliation ploy against Dem governors backfires

President Donald Trump on Wednesday walked back a snub he gave to two Democratic Governors. Last week, Trump notably did not invite Democratic governors Wes Moore
Share
Rawstory2026/02/12 10:29
Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

The post Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This morning, Bitcoin Core developers celebrated improved block reconstruction statistics for node operators while conveniently ignoring the reason for these statistics — the downward trend in fees for Bitcoin’s security budget. Reacting with heart emojis and thumbs up to a green chart showing over 80% “successful compact block reconstructions without any requested transactions,” they conveniently omitted red trend lines of the fees that Bitcoin users pay for mining security which powered those green statistics. Block reconstructions occur when a node requests additional information about transactions within a compact block. Although compact blocks allow nodes to quickly relay valid bundles of transactions across the internet, the more frequently that nodes can reconstruct without extra, cumbersome transaction requests from their peers is a positive trend. Because so many nodes switched over in August to relay transactions bidding 0.1 sat/vB across their mempools, nodes now have to request less transaction data to reconstruct blocks containing sub-1 sat/vB transactions. After nodes switched over in August to accept and relay pending transactions bidding less than 1 sat/vB, disparate mempools became harmonized as most nodes had a better view of which transactions would likely join upcoming blocks. As a result, block reconstruction times improved, as nodes needed less information about these sub-1 sat/vB transactions. In July, several miners admitted that user demand for Bitcoin blockspace had persisted at such a low that they were willing to accept transaction fees of just 0.1 satoshi per virtual byte — 90% lower than their prior 1 sat/vB minimum. With so many blocks partially empty, they succumbed to the temptation to accept at least something — even 1 billionth of one bitcoin (BTC) — rather than $0 to fill up some of the excess blockspace. Read more: Bitcoin’s transaction fees have fallen to a multi-year low Green stats for block reconstruction after transaction fees crash After…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:07