Osmosis has proposed merging its chain into the Cosmos Hub to make its DEX native infrastructure for the Hub. The merger would swap OSMO tokens for ATOM at a rateOsmosis has proposed merging its chain into the Cosmos Hub to make its DEX native infrastructure for the Hub. The merger would swap OSMO tokens for ATOM at a rate

Osmosis Proposal Aims to Align Cosmos Around ATOM as Core Coordination Asset

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Osmosis has proposed merging its chain into the Cosmos Hub to make its DEX native infrastructure for the Hub.
  • The merger would swap OSMO tokens for ATOM at a rate of 0.0355:1.998, based on price patterns in the past 30 days.

Osmosis, the largest decentralized application in the Cosmos ecosystem, has introduced a proposal to merge its DEX into the Cosmos Hub and make ATOM the main crypto asset capturing the value of all its trading activity.

The new proposal would need to be approved by the governance teams of both chains. Osmosis says, if approved, it would unify liquidity, governance and security, all under a single chain.

Sunny Aggarwal, the Osmosis founder who published the proposal, said it’s critical that the entire Cosmos ecosystem works in unity to strengthen ATOM’s direct economic foundations, especially now when the ecosystem has been contracting. As CNF reported in January, one of the key architects of the Cosmos interoperability protocol (IBC) declared that the ecosystem “is pretty much dead,” pointing to the many projects that have folded.

This makes the new proposal vital to the network’s survival and “reflects a natural evolution for Cosmos: sovereign experimentation followed by consolidation once infrastructure has matured,” Osmosis says.

Osmosis launched in 2021 and has since grown to become the largest liquidity venue for Cosmos tokens. In Cosmos, protocols build independent blockchains separate from the main Cosmos Hub, but interconnected to the rest of the ecosystem through the Inter‑Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol. Osmosis has its own validators, governance system and token, called OSMO. 

If the new proposal is accepted, it would cease to be an independent blockchain and redeploy all its DEX modules directly on the Cosmos Hub.

Osmosis Seeks to Save Struggling Cosmos Network

The proposal represents a change in direction for the Cosmos network. For years, it has pushed projects to launch independent blockchains, and many successful projects came from this model, including Injective, Celestial and dYdX. The drawback is that the success of these projects does not reflect on ATOM as they have their own tokens, like Injective’s $296 million INJ and Celestia’s $291 million TIA.

Another challenge has been liquidity fragmentation. While all these blockchains remain interconnected through IBC, they have varying incentives and validators.

Osmosis wants to solve both challenges with its proposal. It says:

The benefit for Cosmos and ATOM will be immediate. Osmosis says it generated $5.5 million in revenue last year, and its operating costs only hit $550,000. It pledges to use this profit as a revenue stream for ATOM holders to reinvest in other Cosmos Hub initiatives.

If the migration goes through, OSMO tokens would be converted to ATOM at a rate of 0.0355 ATOM per 1.998 OSMO, based on the 30-day price patterns.

ATOM trades at $1.81, shedding 3.5% in the past week and 24% since mid-February.

]]>
Market Opportunity
COSMOS Logo
COSMOS Price(ATOM)
$1.837
$1.837$1.837
-0.54%
USD
COSMOS (ATOM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Share
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Share
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54