The post $187 Billion in Fees: Why Banks Are Fighting the GENIUS Act appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Why banks might be worried  Backtracking on the GENIUS Act A major fight has emerged between traditional finance and the cryptocurrency industry over regulation.   Banking institutions have been pushing against stablecoins, arguing that they would drain deposits.  However, crypto advocates claim that banks are actually concerned about losing profits.  Banks claim stablecoins will drain deposits and harm lending, but there’s no evidence supporting this. Bank attacks on the bipartisan GENIUS Act and on @POTUS’s crypto agenda aren’t about stability—they’re about protecting $187B in payment fees. Stablecoins modernize payments and… — Faryar Shirzad 🛡️ (@faryarshirzad) September 16, 2025 Why banks might be worried  Faryar Shirzad, chief policy officer at cryptocurrency exchange giant Coinbase, claims that the hostility from banks is all about protecting a staggering $187 billion worth of fees that they are getting from payment-related fees.  If stablecoins end up gaining widespread mainstream adoption, people might avoid using the payment rails offered by banks, thus depriving them of the massive profits.  You Might Also Like Coinbase and other crypto lobbyists argue that stablecoins are primarily used as payment tools. Thus, there is no evidence that they will cause some sort of deposit flight.  Backtracking on the GENIUS Act Even though the banking sector initially supported the GENIUS Act, they later ended up backtracking on it.  Crypto lobbyists now claim that stablecoins are the latest innovation that banks are trying to slow down after previously opposing ATM machines and online banking.  Source: https://u.today/187-billion-in-fees-why-banks-are-fighting-the-genius-actThe post $187 Billion in Fees: Why Banks Are Fighting the GENIUS Act appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Why banks might be worried  Backtracking on the GENIUS Act A major fight has emerged between traditional finance and the cryptocurrency industry over regulation.   Banking institutions have been pushing against stablecoins, arguing that they would drain deposits.  However, crypto advocates claim that banks are actually concerned about losing profits.  Banks claim stablecoins will drain deposits and harm lending, but there’s no evidence supporting this. Bank attacks on the bipartisan GENIUS Act and on @POTUS’s crypto agenda aren’t about stability—they’re about protecting $187B in payment fees. Stablecoins modernize payments and… — Faryar Shirzad 🛡️ (@faryarshirzad) September 16, 2025 Why banks might be worried  Faryar Shirzad, chief policy officer at cryptocurrency exchange giant Coinbase, claims that the hostility from banks is all about protecting a staggering $187 billion worth of fees that they are getting from payment-related fees.  If stablecoins end up gaining widespread mainstream adoption, people might avoid using the payment rails offered by banks, thus depriving them of the massive profits.  You Might Also Like Coinbase and other crypto lobbyists argue that stablecoins are primarily used as payment tools. Thus, there is no evidence that they will cause some sort of deposit flight.  Backtracking on the GENIUS Act Even though the banking sector initially supported the GENIUS Act, they later ended up backtracking on it.  Crypto lobbyists now claim that stablecoins are the latest innovation that banks are trying to slow down after previously opposing ATM machines and online banking.  Source: https://u.today/187-billion-in-fees-why-banks-are-fighting-the-genius-act

$187 Billion in Fees: Why Banks Are Fighting the GENIUS Act

  • Why banks might be worried 
  • Backtracking on the GENIUS Act

A major fight has emerged between traditional finance and the cryptocurrency industry over regulation.  

Banking institutions have been pushing against stablecoins, arguing that they would drain deposits. 

However, crypto advocates claim that banks are actually concerned about losing profits. 

Why banks might be worried 

Faryar Shirzad, chief policy officer at cryptocurrency exchange giant Coinbase, claims that the hostility from banks is all about protecting a staggering $187 billion worth of fees that they are getting from payment-related fees. 

If stablecoins end up gaining widespread mainstream adoption, people might avoid using the payment rails offered by banks, thus depriving them of the massive profits. 

You Might Also Like

Coinbase and other crypto lobbyists argue that stablecoins are primarily used as payment tools. Thus, there is no evidence that they will cause some sort of deposit flight. 

Backtracking on the GENIUS Act

Even though the banking sector initially supported the GENIUS Act, they later ended up backtracking on it. 

Crypto lobbyists now claim that stablecoins are the latest innovation that banks are trying to slow down after previously opposing ATM machines and online banking. 

Source: https://u.today/187-billion-in-fees-why-banks-are-fighting-the-genius-act

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006786
$0.006786$0.006786
-3.48%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
Why is the Trump-backed WLFI Token Price Up Today?

Why is the Trump-backed WLFI Token Price Up Today?

The post Why is the Trump-backed WLFI Token Price Up Today? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News World Liberty Financial’s native token WLFI, backed by the
Share
CoinPedia2026/02/09 18:54
Unlock 24/7 Crypto Blackjack Customer Support Now

Unlock 24/7 Crypto Blackjack Customer Support Now

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Did you know BC.Game supports
Share
Cryptsy2026/02/09 19:33