Foundry USA and AntPool currently control over 51% of Bitcoin's global hashrate

2025/08/22 00:34

There is a growing fear that Bitcoin is at risk of a 51% attack, as two mining pools, Foundary and AntPool, have gained over 51% control of the total network hashrate.

Recent on-chain data shows that Foundry USA currently controls 33.63% of Bitcoin mining hashrate, followed by AntPool, which sits at 17.94%. Together, the two firms hold nearly 52% control of the Bitcoin mining network, which many have deemed a centralization risk.

It becomes even more concerning seeing Foundry USA mine six blocks, and sometimes eight blocks, in a row. 

There has never been a successful 51% attack on Bitcoin. But should you be worried now? Or is this another FUD? Well, the concerns are valid, but overstated.

Is BTC at risk of a 51% attack?

A 51% attack on Bitcoin can only occur when a single entity controls more than half of the network’s hashrate, at least 51%. 

With that dominance, the attacker can reorganize blocks, double-spend their own coins, censor transactions, and even monopolize Bitcoin mining. It’s a direct threat to the Bitcoin network’s integrity, which is why news around a majority control of BTC hashrate usually carries an unsettling concern.

In the case of Foundry and AntPool, the risk is somewhat present, but it is most likely not to happen. It would require a consortium of both pools to successfully pull a 51% attack on the Bitcoin network, but that would the detrimental to their business.

Recall that Foundry and AntPool are not miners themselves. Rather, they are just pools that consolidate the hashpower from thousands of individual miners around the world. They don’t own all that hardware.

So, achieving that perfect collusion of both pools, where thousands of individual miners therein agree to come together to double-spend, is simply far-fetched. 

An attempt would only hurt the businesses, as most of the miners, who are true to the Bitcoin network, would switch to different pools. 

Bitcoin’s first 51% attack scare

This is not the first time Bitcoin has faced a 51% attack concern. The most common scare happened in 2014, when another mining pool dubbed GHash.io briefly gained control of over 51% of the network hashrate.

According to reports, GHash.io’s dominance was the case that proved, in fact, possible for a single entity to gain a majority of the network’s mining power.

The Bitcoin community responded with immense social pressure. Forums like Reddit and BitcoinTalk exploded with calls for miners to leave GHash.io and diversify their hashrate. 

Although GHash.io never attempted to carry out a malicious attack, most of the miners subscribed to the pool voluntarily left the pool amid the social outcry, causing its hashrate to drop back below 50%.

Centralization by industry, not by protocol

The original idea for Bitcoin mining was to decentralize the network, where anyone with a computer could participate in mining. But over time, the difficulty and entry barrier have increased, which has led to the consolidation of these miners for consistent and predictable profits.

Foundry and AntPool gaining over 51% control of the total hashrate isn’t really a case of a de facto centralization of the Bitcoin network. Industrial centralization is a more accurate description of what’s actually happening.

Bitcoin mining, rather than the protocol itself, is becoming centralized, with only five pools controlling nearly 80% of the global hashrate. It’s now more difficult for small and solo miners to compete, which erodes Bitcoin’s decentralization ethos. 

It could get worse from here. As the difficulty and competition toughen, the largest and most profitable pools will continue to attract the most hashrate, causing the hashpower to become even more centralized.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

World Liberty Financial Ownership Shake-Up: Trump Family Cuts Stake During Stablecoin Push

World Liberty Financial Ownership Shake-Up: Trump Family Cuts Stake During Stablecoin Push

Key Takeaways: Trump’s company reduced its stake in World Liberty Financial from 60% to 40%. The move follows earlier cuts from a 75% holding and came without public disclosure. Trump earned $57.4 million from the project over a 12-month span ending in December 2024. Donald Trump ’s company has reduced its stake in World Liberty Financial from 60% to 40%, according to website disclosures reviewed by Forbes in a report published on June 19. The adjustment was made without a public announcement, suggesting a behind-the-scenes divestment during his presidency. Divestment From World Liberty Financial World Liberty Financial launched in September 2024 as a crypto venture backed by the Trump family. Early filings showed DT Marks DEFI LLC, a Trump-controlled entity, held a 75% stake. The holding dropped to 60% by January 2025, around the time of Trump’s second inauguration. A court-appointed monitor also received notice of an intended partial stake sale around that period. The venture has since recorded over $550 million in token sales, and recently announced a dollar-linked stablecoin. A $2 billion commitment from a UAE investment firm gave the stablecoin initial traction. By June 5, the company’s value had been informally compared to Circle, which went public the same day. According to the report, changes to World Liberty’s website after June 8 show DT Marks DEFI LLC now holds roughly 40% of the company. While no specifics were released, Forbes estimated the sale could have generated about $190 million, with approximately $135 million potentially accruing to Trump personally if the valuation aligns with Circle’s. Milestone achieved: the first USD1-exclusive IDO with @saharalabsAI on @Buidlpad was a big success—$59M USD1 contributed! https://t.co/ScJR3HFqrP — WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) June 17, 2025 Trump Made $57.4 Million From WLFI President Donald Trump earned $57.4 million from World Liberty Financial over a roughly 12-month period ending in December 2024, according to a financial disclosure released on June 14. The figure represents the income from the sale of nontransferable $WLFI tokens and related products, including USD1, the company’s stablecoin. The Trump family collectively holds 22.5 billion tokens of the project. Trump’s earnings are routed through the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, which is overseen by Donald Trump Jr. and allows the president to collect business income while in office. Despite mounting scrutiny from lawmakers, the Trump administration has continued to advance digital asset policies, including stablecoin legislation passed in the Senate earlier this month. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Could the sale of ownership affect Trump’s influence over the company? While a reduced stake lowers financial exposure, control could still remain strong depending on the operating agreement. Influence isn’t solely determined by equity percentage but also by governance structures within the LLC. How are foreign governments reacting to the project? Some governments, including Pakistan, have cited Trump’s backing as a credibility marker. The project’s association with a sitting president may influence international perception and adoption. What are lawmakers concerned about with World Liberty’s foreign ties? Critics argue that partnerships with foreign-backed entities, especially in sensitive sectors like finance, may present ethics or national security risks when linked to a sitting president’s business interests.
Share
CryptoNews2025/06/20 04:45
Share