Generative AI: Is It Moving From Large Language Models to Small Languge Models?

2025/09/14 01:00

While LLMs, or large language models, have played a pivotal role in the significant growth witnessed by GenAI, they do come with a number of built-in issues that act as a damper on the universal adoption of the technology. For one, the fact that LLM necessitates the training of models that need to take billions and billions of parameters into account, which is something that requires an enormous amount of investment.

\ This ensures that only the largest technology companies with untold resources can seriously look at adopting this technology. Besides, the sheer consumption of energy to run the servers can prove to be an environmental nightmare.

\ This is where the move to SLMs or small language models makes eminent sense. As these need to conform to a much smaller number of parameters than in the case of LLMs, they are able to run admirably on devices with lesser processing power, including browsers, edge & IoT devices, and smartphones. What’s more, the quantum of resources needed to be deployed for this is way lower.

\ SLM technology is more decentralized in that it can be customized to handle precise tasks as well as datasets. This exposure to much more diverse datasets often makes them much more efficient than large language models trained on a limited amount of data.

\ As smaller language models do not have large hardware requirements, these are usually much cheaper to deploy, encouraging more and more organizations and individuals to leverage their power. Another great advantage of using SLMs is the fact that one no longer needs to share one’s sensitive information with external servers, helping you to have enhanced digital security. As you can never really fully comprehend the decision-making process with regard to LLMs, there is an ever-present trust deficit that does not bode well for the implementation of that model in a manner that aligns with your objectives.

\ The widespread adoption of SLM that we see on a daily basis includes things like smart mail suggestions, grammar and spelling checks, voice assistants, real-time text translations, search engine auto fills, and so on. This is a testament to the increased use of SLMs in preference to the conventional LLMs by more and more businesses and enterprises, especially by those who put a premium on cost, better control over technology, and the security of sensitive information.

Summary

Though both LLMs and SLMs have played a critical role in mainstreaming GenAI, the growing popularity of the latter is something that has been quite discernible for some time now. To summarize, SLMs are growing in popularity on account of the fact that LLMs require the deployment of large amounts of resources, which require a substantial investment. Apart from that, SLMs lend themselves to customization more easily, making them a more efficient alternative to LLMs.

\ To top it all, SLMs offer better security. SLMs are increasingly taking over from LLMs across small businesses and enterprises, and this trend is here to stay.


Feature photo by Google DeepMind

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Why Onchain Crypto Collateral Can Get You Better Loan-To-Value Ratios

Why Onchain Crypto Collateral Can Get You Better Loan-To-Value Ratios

The post Why Onchain Crypto Collateral Can Get You Better Loan-To-Value Ratios appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fabian Dori, the chief investment officer at digital asset bank Sygnum, says that banks offering crypto-backed loans prefer crypto collateral in the form of onchain assets rather than exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and using onchain collateral can benefit borrowers. Dori said that onchain assets are more liquid, allowing lenders to execute margin calls for crypto-backed loans on demand and offer higher loan-to-value (LTV) ratios to borrowers because the lender can liquidate the collateral in real-time. Dori told Cointelegraph: “It’s actually preferable to have the direct tokens as collateral, because then you can do it 24/7. If you need to execute a margin call on an ETF on Friday at midnight, when the market is closed, then it’s more difficult. So, direct token holding is actually preferable from that point of view.” Loan-to-value ratios in crypto refer to the total amount of a loan versus the collateral backing the loan, like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), or any other tokens accepted by the lender.  Lending in crypto by centralized institutions sharply declined during the 2022 bear market, which saw the blow-up of several crypto lending firms, but is on the rise again. Source: Galaxy A higher LTV ratio means the borrower is able to access more credit in relation to their posted crypto collateral, while a lower LTV means they will get a smaller loan for the same amount of collateral. Crypto-backed loans are still in their infancy, Dori said, but he was confident that the sector would continue to grow as crypto gains widespread adoption.  Financial institutions are steadily embracing loans secured by crypto as crypto lenders go public on US stock exchanges, and traditional financial (TradFi) firms warm up to the idea of accepting crypto as loan collateral.  Related: South Korea caps crypto lending rates at 20%, bans leveraged loans Crypto…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/14 09:29
Share