Hablando del salario mínimo, hay dos cuestiones relevantes: cuánto subirá para 2026 y qué impacto tendrá la decisión de la Comisión Nacional de Salarios Mínimos en el mercado laboral, la inflación y en la narrativa oficial.Hablando del salario mínimo, hay dos cuestiones relevantes: cuánto subirá para 2026 y qué impacto tendrá la decisión de la Comisión Nacional de Salarios Mínimos en el mercado laboral, la inflación y en la narrativa oficial.

¿Podemos culpar al mínimo del desplome en la creación de empleos formales?

Hablando del salario mínimo, hay dos cuestiones relevantes: cuánto subirá para 2026 y qué impacto tendrá la decisión de la Comisión Nacional de Salarios Mínimos en el mercado laboral, la inflación y en la narrativa oficial.

El aumento quedará muy cerca del 12% para la mayor parte del país y, quizá, sea menor para la llamada Zona Libre de la Frontera Norte. No se justifica tener un diferencial de 50.7% entre los dos mínimos oficiales, son 278.80 pesos diarios en casi todo México y 419.88 en la frontera.

Si se decide un aumento de 12%, tendremos un salario mínimo de 312 pesos diarios. Al tipo de cambio del 27 de noviembre, serían 17 dólares diarios, un poco más de 500 dólares mensuales. Lejos de los más altos de América Latina, que son Uruguay con 867 y Costa Rica que tiene 725 aproximadamente. En el caso de la frontera norte, con un aumento de 12%, quedaría en 470 pesos con 26 centavos, equivalentes a un poco más de 750 dólares mensuales.

¿Qué impacto tendría llegar a salarios de 9,471 pesos mensuales y 14,295 en la frontera? Al Gobierno le interesa mantener una trayectoria de crecimiento de los salarios y se ha fijado como objetivo que para 2030 el mínimo pueda comprar 2.5 canastas básicas de productos. A fines de 2025, el mínimo puede comprar 1.8 canastas y podría llegar muy cerca de 2, suponiendo que no haya un rebote de la inflación significativo.

Esto nos lleva a una cuestión: ¿hay riesgo inflacionario en el aumento del salario mínimo? Hay voces que lo advierten. Entre 2018 y 2025 pasamos de 88 a 278 pesos diarios y no hubo un impacto notable en la inflación. El aumento en los precios tuvo otras causas, coinciden los expertos, pero nada garantiza que en los próximos años siga siendo así. De hecho, ya dejamos atrás el punto en el que el salario mínimo en México era extremadamente bajo, uno de los más bajos en América Latina y el Caribe.

¿Está afectando el aumento al salario mínimo la generación de empleo formal? Hay indicios de que es así. Entre enero y septiembre de 2025 se perdieron 553,000 puestos de trabajo en el sector formal, mientras que se crearon 599,000 empleos en la informalidad. Algo está pasando: la creación de empleo en lo que va de 2025 es de apenas 45,000 puestos en los primeros nueve meses. Sin contar el año de la pandemia, es el número más bajo en una década. Es evidente que muchos empleos “migraron” de la formalidad a la informalidad, aunque es imposible saber cuánta de esta “migración” se debe al mínimo. En México es caro y complicado generar puestos de trabajo formales.

¿Podemos culpar al mínimo de este desplome en la creación de empleos? Estamos ante un asunto complejo donde hay otros factores en juego. La economía está casi estancada, con un crecimiento proyectado menor a 0.5% en 2025. La inversión privada, que es la principal responsable de la generación de empleos, trae una tendencia negativa y podría registrar una caída mayor a 7% en 2025.

En la búsqueda de “culpables” de la no generación de empleos formales, no podemos dejar de lado algunos factores no económicos, como la inseguridad. En un país donde la extorsión es el delito que más ha crecido en la última década, no debe extrañarnos que haya empresarios que prefieren cerrar su negocio que tener al extorsionador como socio.

En los próximos días, la Comisión Nacional del Salario Mínimo dará a conocer su decisión. Apuesto a que será cerca del 12% y que el Gobierno emitirá un mensaje de que seguiremos así en los próximos años. Es muy importante mantener la narrativa en uno de los temas en que la política pública mejor ha funcionado con la 4T. El aumento al mínimo ha servido para reducir el número de pobres, tanto o más que las transferencias sociales. Ha servido también para crecer la masa salarial e impulsar el mercado interno.

Hay veces que es malo tener demasiado de lo bueno, dijo Mae West, una actriz estadounidense de la primera mitad del siglo pasado. No podemos seguir indefinidamente con incrementos anuales de doble dígito del salario mínimo. Si la economía no crece, ¿cómo pagarlos? Si la generación de empleo formal se está frenando, ¿por qué actuar como si no estuviera pasando nada? Hay focos rojos en el tablero. ¿Quién dará la orden de llevar el coche al taller?

Te puede interesar

  • El Economista

    Opinión

    ¿Es posible redistribuir el trabajo doméstico no remunerado?

  • El Economista

    Opinión

    La COP 30 fracasó, ¿por qué debería importarnos?

  • El Economista

    Opinión

    Minería: el T-MEC, la oportunidad para salir de los claroscuros

Piyasa Fırsatı
ArchLoot Logosu
ArchLoot Fiyatı(AL)
$0.01151
$0.01151$0.01151
-2.45%
USD
ArchLoot (AL) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

BitcoinWorld Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon? The financial world is buzzing with discussions around the future of monetary policy, and a recent statement from a key Federal Reserve official has added fuel to the fire. Investors, businesses, and consumers alike are keenly watching for signals regarding potential Fed interest rate cuts and their broader economic implications. What’s Driving Talk of Fed Interest Rate Cuts? Neel Kashkari, the president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, recently made headlines by stating his belief that two additional Fed interest rate cuts would be appropriate this year. This isn’t the first time Kashkari has shared this perspective; he expressed a similar view back in August. His comments offer a glimpse into the ongoing internal debates and varying outlooks among policymakers regarding the optimal path for the nation’s economy. Understanding the context behind such statements is crucial. The Federal Reserve uses interest rates as a primary tool to manage inflation and support employment. When inflation is high, the Fed typically raises rates to cool down economic activity. Conversely, when economic growth slows or inflation targets are met, the Fed might consider cutting rates to stimulate spending and investment. How Do Fed Interest Rate Cuts Impact You? The prospect of Fed interest rate cuts carries significant weight for everyone. For instance, lower interest rates generally translate to: Cheaper Borrowing: Mortgages, car loans, and credit card interest rates can decrease, making it more affordable for consumers to borrow money. This can encourage home buying and larger purchases. Business Investment: Companies find it less expensive to borrow for expansion, new projects, and hiring, potentially boosting economic growth and job creation. Stock Market Performance: Lower rates can make bonds less attractive, pushing investors towards stocks, which might see increased valuations. This can also signal a more optimistic economic outlook. Savings Account Returns: On the flip side, interest rates on savings accounts and Certificates of Deposit (CDs) might also fall, offering lower returns for savers. These ripple effects touch various sectors, from housing to retail, and even extend into the cryptocurrency markets, where investor sentiment is often influenced by broader economic conditions and liquidity. Navigating the Economic Landscape: Why Are Policymakers Divided on Fed Interest Rate Cuts? While some policymakers, like Kashkari, see the appropriateness of multiple Fed interest rate cuts, others may hold different views. The Federal Reserve’s decisions are complex, balancing the need to control inflation with the goal of maintaining maximum employment. Key factors influencing these decisions include: Inflation Data: The pace at which inflation is returning to the Fed’s 2% target is a primary concern. Sustained progress is needed. Employment Figures: A strong job market might give the Fed more leeway to keep rates higher for longer, whereas signs of weakness could prompt cuts. Global Economic Conditions: International economic trends and geopolitical events can also influence the Fed’s domestic policy decisions. Market Expectations: The Fed also considers how financial markets are pricing in future rate movements, aiming to avoid undue volatility. The path forward is rarely straightforward, and the Fed’s approach is often described as data-dependent, meaning decisions can shift as new economic information becomes available. The Outlook for Future Fed Interest Rate Cuts Kashkari’s consistent view on two Fed interest rate cuts this year provides an important perspective, but it’s essential to remember that he is one voice among many on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The committee as a whole determines monetary policy through a consensus-driven process. As the year progresses, market participants will be closely monitoring upcoming inflation reports, employment data, and official Fed statements for further clarity. The timing and magnitude of any potential rate adjustments will significantly shape the economic environment, influencing everything from investment strategies to everyday household budgets. In summary: Neel Kashkari’s consistent advocacy for two Fed interest rate cuts this year highlights a potential shift in monetary policy. These cuts, if they materialize, could offer relief to borrowers, stimulate economic activity, and impact various markets. However, the ultimate decision rests with the broader Federal Reserve committee, which weighs a multitude of economic indicators before acting. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does it mean when the Fed cuts interest rates? When the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, it generally means they are reducing the cost for banks to borrow money. This, in turn, often leads to lower interest rates for consumers and businesses on loans like mortgages, car loans, and credit cards, aiming to stimulate economic activity. Q2: Why would the Fed consider two Fed interest rate cuts this year? The Fed might consider two interest rate cuts if they believe inflation is consistently moving towards their 2% target, or if there are signs of slowing economic growth that could benefit from stimulation. Policymakers like Kashkari may feel the current rates are too restrictive given the economic outlook. Q3: How quickly do Fed interest rate cuts affect the economy? The effects of Fed interest rate cuts can be seen relatively quickly in financial markets, but they typically take several months to fully filter through to the broader economy, impacting consumer spending, business investment, and inflation. Q4: Will Fed interest rate cuts impact my cryptocurrency investments? While not a direct impact, Fed interest rate cuts can indirectly affect cryptocurrency markets. Lower traditional interest rates might make riskier assets like cryptocurrencies more attractive to investors seeking higher returns. Additionally, a more liquid and stimulated economy can sometimes boost overall market sentiment, benefiting crypto assets. Q5: Who is Neel Kashkari? Neel Kashkari is the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. He is one of the twelve regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents who contribute to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) discussions, which set the nation’s monetary policy. Did you find this article insightful? Share your thoughts and help others understand the potential impact of future Fed decisions! You can share this article on your favorite social media platforms. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon? first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/19 19:35
US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams

US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams

The post US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Crypto scams are getting faster, smarter and
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/12/17 18:33
Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg

Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg

Bloomberg exposes Crypto.com’s 2023 user data leak. The perpetrators used phishing to access employee accounts, compromising privacy. A data breach that occurred in 2023 at Crypto.com compromised the personal information of its users, according to a disclosure by Bloomberg.  The hacking was planned by a well-known hacker organization known as Scattered Spider.  This team was […] The post Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Paylaş
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/23 03:00