The post Trump Can’t Send National Guard Troops To Los Angeles, Judge Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline National Guard troops can no longer be deployed in Los Angeles while the case over their presence in the city is pending, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the Trump administration was keeping troops in the city “despite no evidence” that they are necessary and marking the latest legal blow to Trump’s military deployment in major U.S. cities. National Guardsmen on June 9 in Downtown Los Angeles, California. Getty Images Key Facts U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Los Angeles while litigation is pending and ordered the federal government to return control of California’s National Guard to the state’s Gov. Gavin Newsom. Approximately 300 National Guard troops are still in the city, months after President Donald Trump first deployed the military in California, with Breyer ruling that the troops were staying in the city “despite no evidence that execution of federal law is impeded in any way—let alone significantly.” The Trump administration initially federalized the National Guard and sent troops to California in June, and has claimed in court that it can keep extending its orders keeping troops in the city indefinitely without courts being able to challenge it. Breyer disagreed and called the Trump administration’s reasoning “shocking,” writing that adopting that line of thinking “would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops” and would “validate the Founders’ ‘widespread fear [of] a national standing Army.’” Los Angeles is one of several Democratic-leaning cities where Trump has deployed troops—and legal battles are now playing out as a result—along with Portland, Oregon, and Chicago. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson maintained in a statement that Trump has “lawful authority” to send troops to Los Angeles, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement it… The post Trump Can’t Send National Guard Troops To Los Angeles, Judge Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline National Guard troops can no longer be deployed in Los Angeles while the case over their presence in the city is pending, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the Trump administration was keeping troops in the city “despite no evidence” that they are necessary and marking the latest legal blow to Trump’s military deployment in major U.S. cities. National Guardsmen on June 9 in Downtown Los Angeles, California. Getty Images Key Facts U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Los Angeles while litigation is pending and ordered the federal government to return control of California’s National Guard to the state’s Gov. Gavin Newsom. Approximately 300 National Guard troops are still in the city, months after President Donald Trump first deployed the military in California, with Breyer ruling that the troops were staying in the city “despite no evidence that execution of federal law is impeded in any way—let alone significantly.” The Trump administration initially federalized the National Guard and sent troops to California in June, and has claimed in court that it can keep extending its orders keeping troops in the city indefinitely without courts being able to challenge it. Breyer disagreed and called the Trump administration’s reasoning “shocking,” writing that adopting that line of thinking “would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops” and would “validate the Founders’ ‘widespread fear [of] a national standing Army.’” Los Angeles is one of several Democratic-leaning cities where Trump has deployed troops—and legal battles are now playing out as a result—along with Portland, Oregon, and Chicago. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson maintained in a statement that Trump has “lawful authority” to send troops to Los Angeles, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement it…

Trump Can’t Send National Guard Troops To Los Angeles, Judge Rules

2025/12/11 00:37

Topline

National Guard troops can no longer be deployed in Los Angeles while the case over their presence in the city is pending, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, saying the Trump administration was keeping troops in the city “despite no evidence” that they are necessary and marking the latest legal blow to Trump’s military deployment in major U.S. cities.

National Guardsmen on June 9 in Downtown Los Angeles, California.

Getty Images

Key Facts

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Los Angeles while litigation is pending and ordered the federal government to return control of California’s National Guard to the state’s Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Approximately 300 National Guard troops are still in the city, months after President Donald Trump first deployed the military in California, with Breyer ruling that the troops were staying in the city “despite no evidence that execution of federal law is impeded in any way—let alone significantly.”

The Trump administration initially federalized the National Guard and sent troops to California in June, and has claimed in court that it can keep extending its orders keeping troops in the city indefinitely without courts being able to challenge it.

Breyer disagreed and called the Trump administration’s reasoning “shocking,” writing that adopting that line of thinking “would permit a president to create a perpetual police force comprised of state troops” and would “validate the Founders’ ‘widespread fear [of] a national standing Army.’”

Los Angeles is one of several Democratic-leaning cities where Trump has deployed troops—and legal battles are now playing out as a result—along with Portland, Oregon, and Chicago.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson maintained in a statement that Trump has “lawful authority” to send troops to Los Angeles, while California Attorney General Rob Bonta celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement it was “a good day for our democracy and the strength of the rule of law.”

Crucial Quote

“The Founders designed our government to be a system of checks and balances,” Breyer wrote in his opinion Wednesday. “Defendants, however, make clear that the only check they want is a blank one.”

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/10/trump-cant-deploy-national-guard-in-los-angeles-judge-rules/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21